Question 1

What is the main difference between Kuzu - Çiğ, Az Yağlı and Av Eti - Çiğ?

Accepted Answer

This comparison summarizes the key differences between Kuzu - Çiğ, Az Yağlı and Av Eti - Çiğ in terms of energy (kcal), nutrition quality score and micronutrient balance. Kuzu - Çiğ, Az Yağlı tends to have a relatively higher energy value, while Kuzu - Çiğ, Az Yağlı usually leads on the nutrition quality score side. Cards and charts on this page help you visually see in which context each food makes more sense.

Question 2

Which one is lower in calories and potentially better for a calorie-restricted diet?

Accepted Answer

Per 100 g, Kuzu - Çiğ, Az Yağlı provides fewer calories than the other option. If you are focusing on calorie control, keeping portions equal, Kuzu - Çiğ, Az Yağlı will usually fit more easily into your daily limits.

Question 3

In which situations should I prefer each of them?

Accepted Answer

If keeping total daily calories low is your main goal, you can prioritize the lower-calorie option as your default and use the other one in smaller portions. If you care more about nutrient density, the food with the higher quality score, Kuzu - Çiğ, Az Yağlı, can take a slightly larger role in your routine. Over the long term, rotating between similar foods is usually a good way to keep both taste and nutrient variety high.

Question 4

How do they compare in protein, fat and carbohydrates?

Accepted Answer

According to the nutrient comparison: Demir: Av Eti - Çiğ leads significantly; B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin): Av Eti - Çiğ leads significantly; Alanin: Kuzu - Çiğ, Az Yağlı leads significantly. The "Nutrients (per 100 g)" table on this page shows in detail which food leads in each nutrient. The one with higher protein may be more advantageous for muscle repair and satiety goals.

Question 5

Which is better for a weight loss diet?

Accepted Answer

In terms of calories, Kuzu - Çiğ, Az Yağlı provides fewer calories per portion, so you consume less energy for the same serving size. This is usually an advantage when aiming for weight loss. The one with the higher nutrition score, Kuzu - Çiğ, Az Yağlı, can help you get more vitamins and minerals for the same calories. Ideal strategy: Use the lower-calorie option as your main portion and add the other in smaller amounts for variety.

Question 6

Which is better after exercise or sports?

Accepted Answer

In terms of protein, Kuzu - Çiğ, Az Yağlı stands out. Since protein intake is important for muscle repair and recovery, Kuzu - Çiğ, Az Yağlı may be a better choice for post-workout meals. Also, the food with higher carbohydrates can help replenish muscle glycogen stores. Check the protein and carbohydrate values in the nutrient comparison on this page to decide.

Nutrients	Kuzu - Çiğ, Az Yağlı	Av Eti - Çiğ	Difference
A Vitamini (IU)	0 iu	0 iu	—
A Vitamini (RAE)	0 µg	0 µg	—
Alanin	1.23 g	0 g	-100.0%
Arjinin	1.21 g	0 g	-100.0%
Aspartik asit	1.8 g	0 g	-100.0%
B1 Vitamini (Tiamin)	0.15 mg	0.16 mg	+6.7%
B12 Vitamini	3.01 µg	0 µg	-100.0%
B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin)	0.32 mg	0.68 mg	+112.5%
B6 Vitamini	0.41 mg	0 mg	-100.0%
Bakir	0.2 mg	0 mg	-100.0%
C Vitamini (askorbik asit)	0 mg	0 mg	—
Demir	1.64 mg	6.65 mg	+305.5%
Diyet lifi	0 g	0 g	—
Enerji	135 kj	674 kj	+399.3%
Fenilalanin	0.83 g	0 g	-100.0%
Fosfor	192 mg	151 mg	-21.4%
Glisin	1 g	0 g	-100.0%
Glutamik asit	2.97 g	0 g	-100.0%
Histidin	0.65 g	0 g	-100.0%
Izolosin	0.99 g	0 g	-100.0%
Kalsiyum	8 mg	3 mg	-62.5%
Karbonhidrat (farkla)	0 g	0 g	—
Kolesterol	64 mg	0 mg	-100.0%
Kül	1.06 g	0.7 g	-34.0%
Lizin	1.81 g	0 g	-100.0%
Losin	1.59 g	0 g	-100.0%
Magnezyum	23 mg	0 mg	-100.0%
Mangan	0.01 mg	0 mg	-100.0%
Metiyonin	0.52 g	0 g	-100.0%
MUFA 14:1	0.01 g	0 g	-100.0%
MUFA 16:1	0.11 g	0 g	-100.0%
MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit)	2.02 g	0 g	-100.0%
MUFA 20:1	0.02 g	0 g	-100.0%
Niasin	5.56 mg	3.2 mg	-42.4%
Pantotenik asit	0.53 mg	0 mg	-100.0%
Potasyum	329 mg	0 mg	-100.0%
Prolin	0.86 g	0 g	-100.0%
Protein	20.46 g	20.1 g	-1.8%
PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit)	0.15 g	0 g	-100.0%
PUFA 18:3	0.07 g	0 g	-100.0%
PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit)	0.03 g	0 g	-100.0%
Retinol	0 µg	0 µg	—
Selenyum	4.6 µg	8.3 µg	+80.4%
Serin	0.76 g	0 g	-100.0%
SFA 10:0	0 g	0 g	—
SFA 12:0	0.01 g	0 g	-100.0%
SFA 14:0	0.15 g	0 g	-100.0%
SFA 15:0	0.02 g	0 g	-100.0%
SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit)	1.09 g	0 g	-100.0%
SFA 17:0	0.06 g	0 g	-100.0%
SFA 18:0 (stearik asit)	0.73 g	0 g	-100.0%
SFA 20:0	0.01 g	0 g	-100.0%
Sistin	0.24 g	0 g	-100.0%
Sodyum	81 mg	0 mg	-100.0%
Su	73.98 g	71.2 g	-3.8%
Tirozin	0.69 g	0 g	-100.0%
Toplam doymus yağ asitleri	2.08 g	0 g	-100.0%
Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri	2.19 g	0 g	-100.0%
Toplam yağ	5.23 g	8.3 g	+58.7%
Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri	0.25 g	0 g	-100.0%
Treonin	0.87 g	0 g	-100.0%
Triptofan	0.24 g	0 g	-100.0%
Valin	1.1 g	0 g	-100.0%
Çinko	4.25 mg	0 mg	-100.0%

Kuzu, Avustralya, İthal, Taze, But, Tam (İncik Ve Bonfile), Sadece Kısım, Az Yağlı, Çiğ vs Av Eti, Ayı Eti, Çiğ

Kuzu - Çiğ, Az Yağlı

Community Insights & Reviews

Ask Question or Rate

Recent Comments

Av Eti - Çiğ

Comparison Analysis

Visual comparison

Energy and score summary

Nutrient profile (normalized radar)

Percentage difference map

Dynamic comparison article

Nutrients (per 100 g)

Comparison Analysis: FAQ

Comparison Results