Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Baharat, Köri Tozu has a higher nutrition quality score (64) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
325 vs 277(-14.8%)
Score Diff
64 vs 11(-82.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Baharat, Köri Tozu
Higher energy
Baharat, Köri Tozu
Score leader
Baharat, Köri Tozu
Nutrient split
18 - 1 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Baharat, Köri Tozu and Ashwagandha Tozu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Baharat, Köri Tozu has 325.0 kcal and Ashwagandha Tozu has 277.0 kcal. The difference is 48.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 64 and 11. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Baharat, Köri Tozu | Ashwagandha Tozu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | 19 iu | — | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 1 µg | — | — |
| ALA (18:3 n-3) | 0.26 g | — | — |
| Alanin | 0.55 g | — | — |
| Alfa Karoten | 0 µg | — | — |
| Arjinin | 0.89 g | — | — |
| Aspartik asit | 1.79 g | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.18 mg | 0.02 mg | -88.9% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0 µg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.2 mg | 0.04 mg | -80.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.1 mg | 0.1 mg | 0.0% |
| Bakir | 1.2 mg | 0.15 mg | -87.5% |
| Besin folati | 56 µg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 11 µg | — | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 0 µg | — | — |
| Beta tokoferol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Betain | 28.8 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0.7 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | — | — |
| D Vitamini (IU) | 0 iu | — | — |
| Delta tokoferol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 19.1 mg | 3.3 mg | -82.7% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | — | — |
| Diyet lifi | 53.2 g | 32.3 g | -39.3% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | — | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 25.24 mg | — | — |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | — | — |
| Enerji | 1359 kj | — | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | — | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | — | — |
| Fenilalanin | 0.58 g | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 56 µg | — | — |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 367 mg | 25 mg | -93.2% |
| Fruktoz | 0.79 g | — | — |
| Galaktoz | 0.21 g | — | — |
| Gama tokoferol | 1.15 mg | — | — |
| Glikoz | 1.14 g | — | — |
| Glisin | 0.79 g | — | — |
| Glutamik asit | 2.27 g | — | — |
| Hidroksiprolin | 0 g | — | — |
| Histidin | 0.29 g | — | — |
| Izolosin | 0.63 g | — | — |
| K Vitamini (dihidrofilokinon) | 0 µg | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 99.8 µg | — | — |
| Kafein | 0 mg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 525 mg | 23 mg | -95.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 55.83 g | 46.9 g | -16.0% |
| Kolesterol | 0 mg | — | — |
| Kül | 7.07 g | 4.4 g | -37.8% |
| Laktoz | 0 g | — | — |
| Likopen | 0 µg | — | — |
| Lizin | 0.7 g | — | — |
| Losin | 0.89 g | — | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 0 µg | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 255 mg | 15 mg | -94.1% |
| Maltoz | 0 g | — | — |
| Mangan | 8.3 mg | 0.8 mg | -90.4% |
| Metiyonin | 0.19 g | — | — |
| MUFA 14:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 15:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| MUFA 17:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 8.74 g | — | — |
| MUFA 18:1 c | 8.74 g | — | — |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| MUFA 24:1 c | 0 g | — | — |
| Niasin | 3.26 mg | 0.08 mg | -97.5% |
| Pantotenik asit | 1.07 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 1170 mg | 120 mg | -89.7% |
| Prolin | 1.24 g | — | — |
| Protein | 14.29 g | 3.7 g | -74.1% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 2.79 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.27 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:3 n-6 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:2 n-6 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:3 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0 g | — | — |
| Retinol | 0 µg | — | — |
| Sakkaroz | 0.62 g | — | — |
| Selenyum | 40.3 µg | — | — |
| Serin | 0.39 g | — | — |
| SFA 10:0 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| SFA 12:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 13:0 | 0.08 g | — | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.64 g | — | — |
| SFA 15:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 0.68 g | — | — |
| SFA 17:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 0.17 g | — | — |
| SFA 20:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 22:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 24:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0.01 g | — | — |
| SFA 6:0 | 0.04 g | — | — |
| SFA 8:0 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| Sistin | 0.2 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 52 mg | 37 mg | -28.8% |
| Su | 8.8 g | 12.7 g | +44.3% |
| Teobromin | 0 mg | — | — |
| TFA 18:1 t | 0 g | — | — |
| Tirozin | 0.4 g | — | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.65 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 56 µg | — | — |
| Toplam Kolin | 64.2 mg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 8.78 g | — | — |
| Toplam trans yağ asitleri | 0 g | — | — |
| Toplam trans-monoenoik yağ asitleri | 0 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 14.01 g | 0.3 g | -97.9% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.06 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.76 g | — | — |
| Treonin | 0.35 g | — | — |
| Triptofan | 0.11 g | — | — |
| Valin | 0.75 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 4.7 mg | 0.2 mg | -95.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Baharat, Köri Tozu and Ashwagandha Tozu.
Ashwagandha Tozu has less energy per 100 g (277 kcal versus 325 kcal).
For measured C Vitamini (askorbik asit), Baharat, Köri Tozu has 0.7 mg and Ashwagandha Tozu has 0 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Baharat, Köri Tozu 64, Ashwagandha Tozu 11.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.