Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
884 kcal
Score
— / 100
At least one nutrition score lacks comparable measurements, so no overall winner is assigned.
Energy Diff
573 vs 884(+54.3%)
Score Diff
46 vs —
Higher energy
Fındık Yağı
Score leader
Insufficient data
Nutrient split
9 - 3 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Altın Susam and Fındık Yağı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Altın Susam has 573.0 kcal and Fındık Yağı has 884.0 kcal. The difference is 311.0 kcal.
There are not enough comparable micronutrient measurements for a score comparison.
12 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Altın Susam | Fındık Yağı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALA (18:3 n-3) | — | 0.1 g | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.79 mg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.25 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.79 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 4.08 mg | — | — |
| Beta-sitosterol | — | 95 mg | — |
| Demir | 14.55 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 11.8 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 47.2 mg | — |
| Enerji | — | 3699 kj | — |
| Fitosteroller | — | 120 mg | — |
| Fosfor | 629 mg | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 14.2 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 975 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 23.45 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Kolesterol | — | 0 mg | — |
| Kül | 4.46 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Magnezyum | 351 mg | — | — |
| Mangan | 2.46 mg | — | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | — | 77.8 g | — |
| Niasin | 4.52 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 468 mg | — | — |
| Protein | 17.73 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | — | 10.1 g | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | — | 5.1 g | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | — | 2.1 g | — |
| Sodyum | 11 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Su | 4.69 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 6.96 g | 7.4 g | +6.3% |
| Toplam Folat | 97 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 18.76 g | 78 g | +315.8% |
| Toplam trans yağ asitleri | — | 0 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 49.67 g | 100 g | +101.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 21.77 g | 10.2 g | -53.1% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 0 g | — |
| Çinko | 7.75 mg | — | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Altın Susam and Fındık Yağı.
Altın Susam has less energy per 100 g (573 kcal versus 884 kcal).
For measured Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri, Altın Susam has 18.76 g and Fındık Yağı has 78 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Altın Susam 46, Fındık Yağı —.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.