Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
168 kcal
Score
17 / 100
Aleesa has a higher nutrition quality score (20) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
148 vs 168(+13.5%)
Score Diff
20 vs 17(-15.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Aleesa
Higher energy
Zhajiang noodles
Score leader
Aleesa
Nutrient split
6 - 12 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Aleesa and Zhajiang noodles are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Aleesa has 148.0 kcal and Zhajiang noodles has 168.0 kcal. The difference is 20.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 20 and 17. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Aleesa | Zhajiang noodles | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.12 mg | 0.16 mg | +33.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.08 mg | 0.11 mg | +37.5% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.14 mg | 0.14 mg | 0.0% |
| Demir | 1.2 mg | 1.45 mg | +20.8% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.1 g | 1.8 g | -14.3% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 148 kcal | — | — |
| Fosfor | 115 mg | 88 mg | -23.5% |
| Kalsiyum | 24 mg | 28 mg | +16.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 18.5 g | 21 g | +13.5% |
| Kolesterol | 18 mg | 16 mg | -11.1% |
| Kül | 1.2 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 34 mg | 22 mg | -35.3% |
| Niasin | 2.3 mg | 2.2 mg | -4.3% |
| Potasyum | 185 mg | 195 mg | +5.4% |
| Protein | 8.5 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 275 mg | 520 mg | +89.1% |
| Su | 68.2 g | 66.5 g | -2.5% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.4 g | 1.95 g | +39.3% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.5 g | 2.45 g | +63.3% |
| Toplam yağ | 4.2 g | 6.1 g | +45.2% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 1.2 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.4 g | 1.9 g | +375.0% |
| Çinko | 1.1 mg | 1.12 mg | +1.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Aleesa and Zhajiang noodles.
Aleesa has less energy per 100 g (148 kcal versus 168 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Aleesa has 0.4 g and Zhajiang noodles has 1.9 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Aleesa 20, Zhajiang noodles 17.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.