Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
128 kcal
Score
42 / 100
Amok trei has a higher nutrition quality score (42) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
148 vs 128(-13.5%)
Score Diff
20 vs 42(+110.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Amok trei
Higher energy
Aleesa
Score leader
Amok trei
Nutrient split
7 - 11 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Aleesa and Amok trei are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Aleesa has 148.0 kcal and Amok trei has 128.0 kcal. The difference is 20.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 20 and 42. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Aleesa | Amok trei | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 35 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.12 mg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 1.4 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.08 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.14 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 3.2 mg | — |
| Demir | 1.2 mg | 1.1 mg | -8.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.1 g | 0.8 g | -61.9% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 148 kcal | — | — |
| Fosfor | 115 mg | 145 mg | +26.1% |
| Kalsiyum | 24 mg | 36 mg | +50.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 18.5 g | 3.1 g | -83.2% |
| Kolesterol | 18 mg | 42 mg | +133.3% |
| Kül | 1.2 g | 1.3 g | +8.3% |
| Magnezyum | 34 mg | 24 mg | -29.4% |
| Niasin | 2.3 mg | 2.1 mg | -8.7% |
| Potasyum | 185 mg | 275 mg | +48.6% |
| Protein | 8.5 g | 11.8 g | +38.8% |
| Sodyum | 275 mg | 380 mg | +38.2% |
| Su | 68.2 g | 75.4 g | +10.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.4 g | 5.2 g | +271.4% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.5 g | 1.1 g | -26.7% |
| Toplam yağ | 4.2 g | 7.6 g | +81.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.8 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.4 g | 1.4 g | +250.0% |
| Çinko | 1.1 mg | 0.75 mg | -31.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Aleesa and Amok trei.
Amok trei has less energy per 100 g (128 kcal versus 148 kcal).
For measured Toplam doymus yağ asitleri, Aleesa has 1.4 g and Amok trei has 5.2 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Aleesa 20, Amok trei 42.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.