Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
230.4 kcal
Score
49 / 100
Ahtapot (Izgara) has a higher nutrition quality score (84) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
164 vs 230.4(+40.5%)
Score Diff
84 vs 49(-41.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ahtapot (Izgara)
Higher energy
Kuzu Külbastı
Score leader
Ahtapot (Izgara)
Nutrient split
15 - 6 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Ahtapot (Izgara) and Kuzu Külbastı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Ahtapot (Izgara) has 164.0 kcal and Kuzu Külbastı has 230.4 kcal. The difference is 66.4 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 84 and 49. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Ahtapot (Izgara) | Kuzu Külbastı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 90 µg | — | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 36 µg | 2.6 µg | -92.8% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.25 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.65 mg | 0.15 mg | -76.9% |
| Bakir | 0.74 mg | 0.12 mg | -83.8% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 8 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 9.54 mg | 2.1 mg | -78.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | — | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 2.1 mg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 279 mg | 210 mg | -24.7% |
| Kalsiyum | 106 mg | 16 mg | -84.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4.4 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Kolesterol | 96 mg | 85 mg | -11.5% |
| Kül | 3.2 g | 1.1 g | -65.6% |
| Magnezyum | 60 mg | 23 mg | -61.7% |
| Niasin | 3.78 mg | 6.2 mg | +64.0% |
| Potasyum | 630 mg | 310 mg | -50.8% |
| Protein | 29.82 g | 25.6 g | -14.2% |
| Selenyum | 89.6 µg | 26.5 µg | -70.4% |
| Sodyum | 460 mg | 70 mg | -84.8% |
| Su | 60.5 g | 58.8 g | -2.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.45 g | 5.8 g | +1188.9% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.32 g | 6.1 g | +1806.2% |
| Toplam yağ | 2.08 g | 14.2 g | +582.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.51 g | 0.9 g | +76.5% |
| Çinko | 3.36 mg | 4.5 mg | +33.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Ahtapot (Izgara) and Kuzu Külbastı.
Ahtapot (Izgara) has less energy per 100 g (164 kcal versus 230.4 kcal).
For measured Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri, Ahtapot (Izgara) has 0.32 g and Kuzu Külbastı has 6.1 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Ahtapot (Izgara) 84, Kuzu Külbastı 49.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.