Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
717 kcal
Score
100 / 100
Tereyağı, Tuzsuz has a higher nutrition quality score (100) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
884 vs 717(-18.9%)
Score Diff
9 vs 100(+1011.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Tereyağı, Tuzsuz
Higher energy
Zeytinyağı (Sızma)
Score leader
Tereyağı, Tuzsuz
Nutrient split
9 - 9 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Zeytinyağı (Sızma) and Tereyağı, Tuzsuz are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Zeytinyağı (Sızma) has 884.0 kcal and Tereyağı, Tuzsuz has 717.0 kcal. The difference is 167.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 9 and 100. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Zeytinyağı (Sızma) | Tereyağı, Tuzsuz | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | — | 2499 iu | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 684 µg | — |
| ALA (18:3 n-3) | — | 0.32 g | — |
| Alanin | — | 0.03 g | — |
| Alfa Karoten | — | 0 µg | — |
| Alfa tokotrienol | — | 0 mg | — |
| Arjinin | — | 0.03 g | — |
| Aspartik asit | — | 0.06 g | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.01 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 0.17 µg | — |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | — | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.03 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0 mg | — |
| Bakir | — | 0.02 mg | — |
| Besin folati | — | 3 µg | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 158 µg | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | — | 0 µg | — |
| Beta tokoferol | — | 0 mg | — |
| Beta tokotrienol | — | 0 mg | — |
| Beta-sitosterol | — | 4 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 0 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | — | 0 µg | — |
| D Vitamini (IU) | — | 0 iu | — |
| D2 Vitamini (ergokalsiferol) | — | 0 µg | — |
| D3 Vitamini (kolekalsiferol) | — | 0 µg | — |
| Delta tokoferol | — | 0 mg | — |
| Delta tokotrienol | — | 0 mg | — |
| Demir | 0.56 mg | 0.02 mg | -96.4% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | — | 0 g | — |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 14.35 mg | 2.32 mg | -83.8% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | — | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | — | 717 kj | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Özel Faktörleri) | 884 kcal | — | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | — | 0 g | — |
| Fenilalanin | — | 0.04 g | — |
| Florür | — | 2.8 µg | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 3 µg | — |
| Folik asit | — | 0 µg | — |
| Fosfor | — | 24 mg | — |
| Gama tokoferol | 0.5 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Gama tokotrienol | — | 0 mg | — |
| Glisin | — | 0.02 g | — |
| Glutamik asit | — | 0.18 g | — |
| Histidin | — | 0.02 g | — |
| Izolosin | — | 0.05 g | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 60.2 µg | 7 µg | -88.4% |
| Kafein | — | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 1 mg | 24 mg | +2300.0% |
| Kampesterol | — | 0 mg | — |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | — | 0.06 g | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | 0 g | — | — |
| Kolesterol | 0 mg | 215 mg | — |
| Kül | — | 0.09 g | — |
| Likopen | — | 0 µg | — |
| Lizin | — | 0.07 g | — |
| Losin | — | 0.08 g | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | — | 0 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | — | 2 mg | — |
| Mangan | — | 0 mg | — |
| Metiyonin | — | 0.02 g | — |
| MUFA 16:1 | — | 1.82 g | — |
| MUFA 16:1 c | — | 0.96 g | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 70 g | 20.4 g | -70.9% |
| MUFA 18:1 c | — | 16.98 g | — |
| MUFA 20:1 | — | 0.1 g | — |
| MUFA 22:1 | — | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | — | 0.04 mg | — |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 0.11 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 1 mg | 24 mg | +2300.0% |
| Prolin | — | 0.08 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.85 g | — |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 10 g | 1.83 g | -81.7% |
| PUFA 18:2 CLA | — | 0.27 g | — |
| PUFA 18:2 i | — | 0.3 g | — |
| PUFA 18:2 n-6 c,c | — | 2.17 g | — |
| PUFA 18:3 | — | 1.18 g | — |
| PUFA 18:4 | — | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | — | 0 g | — |
| Retinol | — | 671 µg | — |
| Selenyum | — | 1 µg | — |
| Serin | — | 0.05 g | — |
| SFA 10:0 | — | 2.53 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | — | 2.59 g | — |
| SFA 14:0 | — | 7.44 g | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 11 g | 21.7 g | +97.3% |
| SFA 17:0 | — | 0.56 g | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 2.5 g | 10 g | +300.0% |
| SFA 20:0 | — | 0.14 g | — |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | — | 3.23 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | — | 2.01 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | — | 1.19 g | — |
| Sistin | — | 0.01 g | — |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | 11 mg | +450.0% |
| Stigmasterol | — | 0 mg | — |
| Su | 0.01 g | 16.17 g | +161600.0% |
| Teobromin | — | 0 mg | — |
| TFA 18:1 t | — | 2.98 g | — |
| Tirozin | — | 0.04 g | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 14 g | 50.49 g | +260.6% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 3 µg | — |
| Toplam Kolin | — | 18.8 mg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 73 g | 23.43 g | -67.9% |
| Toplam yağ | 100 g | 81.11 g | -18.9% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 11 g | 3.01 g | -72.6% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 0.06 g | — |
| Treonin | — | 0.04 g | — |
| Triptofan | — | 0.01 g | — |
| Valin | — | 0.06 g | — |
| Çinko | — | 0.09 mg | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Zeytinyağı (Sızma) and Tereyağı, Tuzsuz.
Tereyağı, Tuzsuz has less energy per 100 g (717 kcal versus 884 kcal).
For measured Su, Zeytinyağı (Sızma) has 0.01 g and Tereyağı, Tuzsuz has 16.17 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Zeytinyağı (Sızma) 9, Tereyağı, Tuzsuz 100.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.