Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
218 kcal
Score
13 / 100
Sirutteok has a higher nutrition quality score (13) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
354 vs 218(-38.4%)
Score Diff
4 vs 13(+225.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Sirutteok
Higher energy
Zalabya
Score leader
Sirutteok
Nutrient split
6 - 13 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Zalabya and Sirutteok are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Zalabya has 354.0 kcal and Sirutteok has 218.0 kcal. The difference is 136.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 4 and 13. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Zalabya | Sirutteok | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.08 mg | 0.11 mg | +37.5% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.05 mg | 0.04 mg | -20.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.09 mg | — |
| Bakir | — | 0.16 mg | — |
| Demir | 1.1 mg | 1.25 mg | +13.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.2 g | 3.6 g | +200.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 2.1 mg | — | — |
| Enerji | 1481 kj | — | — |
| Fosfor | 45 mg | 85 mg | +88.9% |
| Kalsiyum | 18 mg | 24 mg | +33.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 56.5 g | 46.5 g | -17.7% |
| Kül | 1.2 g | 1 g | -16.7% |
| Magnezyum | 12 mg | 28 mg | +133.3% |
| Mangan | — | 0.52 mg | — |
| Niasin | 0.9 mg | 1.15 mg | +27.8% |
| Potasyum | 65 mg | 210 mg | +223.1% |
| Protein | 3.8 g | 5.4 g | +42.1% |
| Sodyum | 110 mg | 195 mg | +77.3% |
| Su | 26 g | 46.2 g | +77.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.8 g | 0.22 g | -87.8% |
| Toplam Folat | 28 µg | 32 µg | +14.3% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.5 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 12.5 g | 0.9 g | -92.8% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 5.5 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 39.5 g | 6.8 g | -82.8% |
| Çinko | 0.45 mg | 0.88 mg | +95.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Zalabya and Sirutteok.
Sirutteok has less energy per 100 g (218 kcal versus 354 kcal).
For measured Potasyum, Zalabya has 65 mg and Sirutteok has 210 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Zalabya 4, Sirutteok 13.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.