Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
329 kcal
Score
41 / 100
Yulaf Kepeği has a higher nutrition quality score (51) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
246 vs 329(+33.7%)
Score Diff
51 vs 41(-19.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Yulaf Kepeği
Higher energy
Adzuki fasulyesi
Score leader
Yulaf Kepeği
Nutrient split
8 - 11 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Yulaf Kepeği and Adzuki fasulyesi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Yulaf Kepeği has 246.0 kcal and Adzuki fasulyesi has 329.0 kcal. The difference is 83.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 51 and 41. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Yulaf Kepeği | Adzuki fasulyesi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 1.17 mg | 0.455 mg | -61.1% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.22 mg | 0.22 mg | 0.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.17 mg | 0.351 mg | +106.5% |
| Bakir | 0.4 mg | 1.09 mg | +172.5% |
| Beta-glukan | 7 g | — | — |
| Demir | 5.41 mg | 4.98 mg | -7.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 15.4 g | 12.7 g | -17.5% |
| Fosfor | 734 mg | 381 mg | -48.1% |
| Kalsiyum | 58 mg | 66 mg | +13.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 66.22 g | 62.96 g | -4.9% |
| Kül | 2.8 g | 3.82 g | +36.4% |
| Magnezyum | 235 mg | 127 mg | -46.0% |
| Mangan | 5.63 mg | 1.73 mg | -69.3% |
| Niasin | 0.93 mg | 2.63 mg | +182.8% |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 1.47 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 566 mg | 1254 mg | +121.6% |
| Protein | 17.3 g | 19.87 g | +14.9% |
| Selenyum | — | 3.2 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 4 mg | 5 mg | +25.0% |
| Su | 8.7 g | 16.32 g | +87.6% |
| Toplam Folat | 52 µg | 622 µg | +1096.2% |
| Toplam yağ | 7.03 g | 0.53 g | -92.5% |
| Çinko | 3.11 mg | 5.04 mg | +62.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Yulaf Kepeği and Adzuki fasulyesi.
Yulaf Kepeği has less energy per 100 g (246 kcal versus 329 kcal).
For measured Toplam Folat, Yulaf Kepeği has 52 µg and Adzuki fasulyesi has 622 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Yulaf Kepeği 51, Adzuki fasulyesi 41.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.