Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
337 kcal
Score
38 / 100
Anasazi fasulyesi has a higher nutrition quality score (38) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
379 vs 337(-11.1%)
Score Diff
27 vs 38(+40.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Anasazi fasulyesi
Higher energy
Yulaf Ezmesi
Score leader
Anasazi fasulyesi
Nutrient split
5 - 14 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Yulaf Ezmesi and Anasazi fasulyesi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Yulaf Ezmesi has 379.0 kcal and Anasazi fasulyesi has 337.0 kcal. The difference is 42.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 27 and 38. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Yulaf Ezmesi | Anasazi fasulyesi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.46 mg | 0.7 mg | +52.2% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.15 mg | 0.2 mg | +33.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.1 mg | 0.4 mg | +300.0% |
| Bakir | 0.49 mg | 0.8 mg | +63.3% |
| Beta-glukan | 4 g | — | — |
| Demir | 4.25 mg | 5.1 mg | +20.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 10.1 g | 15.2 g | +50.5% |
| Folat DFE | 32 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 410 mg | 410 mg | 0.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 52 mg | 135 mg | +159.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 67.7 g | 61.3 g | -9.5% |
| Kül | 1.74 g | 4.2 g | +141.4% |
| Magnezyum | 138 mg | 170 mg | +23.2% |
| Mangan | 3.63 mg | 1.1 mg | -69.7% |
| Niasin | 1.12 mg | 2.1 mg | +87.5% |
| Pantotenik asit | 1.12 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 362 mg | 1360 mg | +275.7% |
| Protein | 13.15 g | 21.5 g | +63.5% |
| Selenyum | 28.9 µg | 12.8 µg | -55.7% |
| Sodyum | 6 mg | 12 mg | +100.0% |
| Su | 10.84 g | 11.8 g | +8.9% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.11 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 525 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.18 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 6.52 g | 1.2 g | -81.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.43 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.99 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 3.64 mg | 2.8 mg | -23.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Yulaf Ezmesi and Anasazi fasulyesi.
Anasazi fasulyesi has less energy per 100 g (337 kcal versus 379 kcal).
For measured B6 Vitamini, Yulaf Ezmesi has 0.1 mg and Anasazi fasulyesi has 0.4 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Yulaf Ezmesi 27, Anasazi fasulyesi 38.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.