Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
371 kcal
Score
41 / 100
Amarant Tohumu has a higher nutrition quality score (41) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
379 vs 371(-2.1%)
Score Diff
27 vs 41(+51.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Amarant Tohumu
Higher energy
Yulaf Ezmesi
Score leader
Amarant Tohumu
Nutrient split
9 - 17 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Yulaf Ezmesi and Amarant Tohumu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Yulaf Ezmesi has 379.0 kcal and Amarant Tohumu has 371.0 kcal. The difference is 8.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 27 and 41. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
26 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Yulaf Ezmesi | Amarant Tohumu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.46 mg | 0.12 mg | -73.9% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.15 mg | 0.2 mg | +33.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.1 mg | 0.59 mg | +490.0% |
| Bakir | 0.49 mg | 0.53 mg | +8.2% |
| Beta-glukan | 4 g | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 4.2 mg | — |
| Demir | 4.25 mg | 7.61 mg | +79.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 10.1 g | 6.7 g | -33.7% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 1.19 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | 32 µg | 82 µg | +156.3% |
| Fosfor | 410 mg | 557 mg | +35.9% |
| Kalsiyum | 52 mg | 159 mg | +205.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 67.7 g | 65.25 g | -3.6% |
| Kül | 1.74 g | 2.88 g | +65.5% |
| Lizin | — | 0.75 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 138 mg | 248 mg | +79.7% |
| Mangan | 3.63 mg | 3.33 mg | -8.3% |
| Niasin | 1.12 mg | 0.92 mg | -17.9% |
| Pantotenik asit | 1.12 mg | 1.46 mg | +30.4% |
| Potasyum | 362 mg | 508 mg | +40.3% |
| Protein | 13.15 g | 13.56 g | +3.1% |
| Selenyum | 28.9 µg | 18.7 µg | -35.3% |
| Sodyum | 6 mg | 4 mg | -33.3% |
| Su | 10.84 g | 11.29 g | +4.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.11 g | 1.46 g | +31.5% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.18 g | 1.69 g | -22.5% |
| Toplam yağ | 6.52 g | 7.02 g | +7.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.43 g | 2.78 g | +14.4% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.99 g | 1.69 g | +70.7% |
| Çinko | 3.64 mg | 2.87 mg | -21.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Yulaf Ezmesi and Amarant Tohumu.
Amarant Tohumu has less energy per 100 g (371 kcal versus 379 kcal).
For measured B6 Vitamini, Yulaf Ezmesi has 0.1 mg and Amarant Tohumu has 0.59 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Yulaf Ezmesi 27, Amarant Tohumu 41.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.