Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
72 kcal
Score
45 / 100
Yaban Turbu (Wasabi) has a higher nutrition quality score (66) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
109 vs 72(-33.9%)
Score Diff
66 vs 45(-31.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Yaban Turbu (Wasabi)
Higher energy
Yaban Turbu (Wasabi)
Score leader
Yaban Turbu (Wasabi)
Nutrient split
16 - 5 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Yaban Turbu (Wasabi) and Arpacık Soğan are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Yaban Turbu (Wasabi) has 109.0 kcal and Arpacık Soğan has 72.0 kcal. The difference is 37.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 66 and 45. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Yaban Turbu (Wasabi) | Arpacık Soğan | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | — | 66 iu | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.13 mg | 0.06 mg | -53.8% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.07 mg | 0.02 mg | -71.4% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.274 mg | 0.345 mg | +25.9% |
| Bakir | 0.154 mg | 0.088 mg | -42.9% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 42.1 mg | 8 mg | -81.0% |
| Demir | 1.03 mg | 1.2 mg | +16.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 7.8 g | 3.2 g | -59.0% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 109 kcal | — | — |
| Fosfor | 166 mg | 60 mg | -63.9% |
| Kalsiyum | 128 mg | 37 mg | -71.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 23.54 g | 16.8 g | -28.6% |
| Kül | 1.92 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 69 mg | 21 mg | -69.6% |
| Mangan | 0.391 mg | 0.292 mg | -25.3% |
| Niasin | 1 mg | 0.2 mg | -80.0% |
| Potasyum | 568 mg | 334 mg | -41.2% |
| Protein | 4.8 g | 2.5 g | -47.9% |
| Selenyum | — | 1.2 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 17 mg | 12 mg | -29.4% |
| Su | 69.1 g | 79.8 g | +15.5% |
| Toplam Folat | 18 µg | 34 µg | +88.9% |
| Toplam yağ | 0.63 g | 0.1 g | -84.1% |
| Toplam Şeker | 6.13 g | 7.87 g | +28.4% |
| Çinko | 1.62 mg | 0.4 mg | -75.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Yaban Turbu (Wasabi) and Arpacık Soğan.
Arpacık Soğan has less energy per 100 g (72 kcal versus 109 kcal).
For measured Toplam Folat, Yaban Turbu (Wasabi) has 18 µg and Arpacık Soğan has 34 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Yaban Turbu (Wasabi) 66, Arpacık Soğan 45.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.