Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
438.5 kcal
Score
8 / 100
Xiaochi has a higher nutrition quality score (14) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
213.7 vs 438.5(+105.2%)
Score Diff
14 vs 8(-42.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Xiaochi
Higher energy
Anarsa
Score leader
Xiaochi
Nutrient split
9 - 11 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Xiaochi and Anarsa are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Xiaochi has 213.7 kcal and Anarsa has 438.5 kcal. The difference is 224.8 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 14 and 8. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Xiaochi | Anarsa | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.16 mg | 0.08 mg | -50.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.12 mg | 0.05 mg | -58.3% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2.5 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 1.6 mg | 2.15 mg | +34.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.8 g | 2.4 g | +33.3% |
| Folat DFE | 38 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 95 mg | 115 mg | +21.1% |
| Kalsiyum | 28 mg | 92 mg | +228.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 26.5 g | 68.5 g | +158.5% |
| Kolesterol | 18 mg | — | — |
| Kül | 1.9 g | 1 g | -47.4% |
| Magnezyum | 18 mg | 42 mg | +133.3% |
| Niasin | 2.1 mg | 1.25 mg | -40.5% |
| Potasyum | 165 mg | 138 mg | -16.4% |
| Protein | 7.8 g | 4.6 g | -41.0% |
| Sodyum | 480 mg | 14 mg | -97.1% |
| Su | 53.5 g | 7.3 g | -86.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.4 g | 6.1 g | +154.2% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.8 g | 5.7 g | +50.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 8.5 g | 16.2 g | +90.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.7 g | 3.4 g | +100.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.5 g | 31.8 g | +2020.0% |
| Çinko | 1.1 mg | 0.85 mg | -22.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Xiaochi and Anarsa.
Xiaochi has less energy per 100 g (213.7 kcal versus 438.5 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Xiaochi has 1.5 g and Anarsa has 31.8 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Xiaochi 14, Anarsa 8.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Xiaochi · Anarsa · Methodology
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.