Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
373 kcal
Score
43 / 100
Wakame yosunu has a higher nutrition quality score (50) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
45 vs 373(+728.9%)
Score Diff
50 vs 43(-14.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Wakame yosunu
Higher energy
Achiote
Score leader
Wakame yosunu
Nutrient split
4 - 15 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Wakame yosunu and Achiote are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Wakame yosunu has 45.0 kcal and Achiote has 373.0 kcal. The difference is 328.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 50 and 43. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Wakame yosunu | Achiote | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 18 µg | 100 µg | +455.6% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.06 mg | 0.25 mg | +316.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.23 mg | 0.4 mg | +73.9% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.35 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.28 mg | 0.5 mg | +78.6% |
| Beta Karoten | — | 1200 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 3 mg | 2 mg | -33.3% |
| Demir | 2.18 mg | 6.5 mg | +198.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.5 g | 16.5 g | +3200.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 1 mg | 0.5 mg | -50.0% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 373 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 120 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 80 mg | 250 mg | +212.5% |
| İyot | 4200 µg | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 5.3 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 150 mg | 355 mg | +136.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 9.14 g | — | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | — | 60.3 g | — |
| Kül | — | 6.48 g | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | — | 50 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 107 mg | 280 mg | +161.7% |
| Mangan | 1.4 mg | 1.5 mg | +7.1% |
| Niasin | 1.6 mg | 3 mg | +87.5% |
| Potasyum | 50 mg | 1250 mg | +2400.0% |
| Protein | 3.03 g | 12.86 g | +324.4% |
| Selenyum | — | 5 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 872 mg | 20 mg | -97.7% |
| Su | 80 g | 8 g | -90.0% |
| Toplam Folat | 196 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.64 g | 12.36 g | +1831.2% |
| Çinko | 0.38 mg | 2.5 mg | +557.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Wakame yosunu and Achiote.
Wakame yosunu has less energy per 100 g (45 kcal versus 373 kcal).
For measured Diyet lifi, Wakame yosunu has 0.5 g and Achiote has 16.5 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Wakame yosunu 50, Achiote 43.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.