Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
282 kcal
Score
77 / 100
Aleppo biberi has a higher nutrition quality score (77) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
277 vs 282(+1.8%)
Score Diff
53 vs 77(+45.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Aleppo biberi
Higher energy
Aleppo biberi
Score leader
Aleppo biberi
Nutrient split
5 - 14 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Uzun Biber (Pippali) and Aleppo biberi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Uzun Biber (Pippali) has 277.0 kcal and Aleppo biberi has 282.0 kcal. The difference is 5.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 53 and 77. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Uzun Biber (Pippali) | Aleppo biberi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 1480 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.11 mg | 0.3 mg | +172.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.24 mg | 0.9 mg | +275.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.29 mg | 2.1 mg | +624.1% |
| Bakir | 1.15 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 310 µg | 17000 µg | +5383.9% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 1.5 mg | 75 mg | +4900.0% |
| Demir | 18.5 mg | 14.5 mg | -21.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 26.3 g | 27.2 g | +3.4% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 28 mg | — |
| Fosfor | 160 mg | 290 mg | +81.3% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 90 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 440 mg | 148 mg | -66.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 58.6 g | 52 g | -11.3% |
| Kül | 4.5 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 165 mg | 152 mg | -7.9% |
| Mangan | 4.8 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 1.85 mg | 8.7 mg | +370.3% |
| Potasyum | 1260 mg | 1950 mg | +54.8% |
| Protein | 10.4 g | 12 g | +15.4% |
| Sodyum | 22 mg | 1600 mg | +7172.7% |
| Su | 11.2 g | 10.5 g | -6.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 1.39 g | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.74 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 3.3 g | 10 g | +203.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.6 g | 10.3 g | +1616.7% |
| Çinko | 1.35 mg | 2.4 mg | +77.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Uzun Biber (Pippali) and Aleppo biberi.
Uzun Biber (Pippali) has less energy per 100 g (277 kcal versus 282 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Uzun Biber (Pippali) has 22 mg and Aleppo biberi has 1600 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Uzun Biber (Pippali) 53, Aleppo biberi 77.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.