Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
358.6 kcal
Score
27 / 100
Kuru Çiğ Yabani Pilav has a higher nutrition quality score (27) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
357.2 vs 358.6(+0.4%)
Score Diff
20 vs 27(+35.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kuru Çiğ Yabani Pilav
Higher energy
Kuru Çiğ Yabani Pilav
Score leader
Kuru Çiğ Yabani Pilav
Nutrient split
10 - 13 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Arpa Unu and Kuru Çiğ Yabani Pilav are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Arpa Unu has 357.2 kcal and Kuru Çiğ Yabani Pilav has 358.6 kcal. The difference is 1.4 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 20 and 27. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
23 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Arpa Unu | Kuru Çiğ Yabani Pilav | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azot | 1.5 g | 2.05 g | +36.7% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.23 mg | 0.34 mg | +47.8% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.15 mg | — | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.2 mg | 0.39 mg | +95.0% |
| Bakir | 0.39 mg | 0.49 mg | +25.6% |
| Beta-glukan | 4.2 g | — | — |
| Biyotin | 8.61 µg | 2.12 µg | -75.4% |
| Demir | 3.3 mg | 1.53 mg | -53.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 12.79 g | 4.26 g | -66.7% |
| Düşük molekül ağırlıklı diyet lifi | 2.31 g | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 366.53 kcal | 369.16 kcal | +0.7% |
| Enerji (Atwater Özel Faktörleri) | 357.19 kcal | 358.55 kcal | +0.4% |
| Fosfor | 234.4 mg | 354.9 mg | +51.4% |
| Kalsiyum | 35.56 mg | 7.97 mg | -77.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 77.4 g | 75.67 g | -2.2% |
| Kül | 1.53 g | 1.41 g | -7.8% |
| Magnezyum | 88.04 mg | 108.5 mg | +23.2% |
| Mangan | 1.18 mg | 1.31 mg | +11.0% |
| Molibden | 57.36 µg | — | — |
| Niasin | 5.94 mg | 6.91 mg | +16.3% |
| Nisasta | 56.86 g | 68.65 g | +20.7% |
| Potasyum | 366.6 mg | 298.8 mg | -18.5% |
| Protein | 8.72 g | 12.79 g | +46.7% |
| Selenyum | 13.1 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 20.33 mg | 1.01 mg | -95.0% |
| Su | 9.9 g | 8.43 g | -14.8% |
| Toplam yağ | 2.45 g | 1.7 g | -30.6% |
| Total dietary fiber (AOAC 2011.25) | 16.15 g | — | — |
| Yüksek molekül ağırlıklı diyet lifi | 13.83 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 2.14 mg | 5.84 mg | +172.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Arpa Unu and Kuru Çiğ Yabani Pilav.
Arpa Unu has less energy per 100 g (357.2 kcal versus 358.6 kcal).
For measured Çinko, Arpa Unu has 2.14 mg and Kuru Çiğ Yabani Pilav has 5.84 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Arpa Unu 20, Kuru Çiğ Yabani Pilav 27.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.