Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
61 kcal
Score
34 / 100
A2 sütü has a higher nutrition quality score (34) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
720 vs 61(-91.5%)
Score Diff
2 vs 34(+1600.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
A2 sütü
Higher energy
Tuzsuz Yayık Tereyağı
Score leader
A2 sütü
Nutrient split
6 - 11 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Tuzsuz Yayık Tereyağı and A2 sütü are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Tuzsuz Yayık Tereyağı has 720.0 kcal and A2 sütü has 61.0 kcal. The difference is 659.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 2 and 34. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Tuzsuz Yayık Tereyağı | A2 sütü | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 684 µg | 28 µg | -95.9% |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 0.45 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.18 mg | — |
| Beta Karoten | 158 µg | — | — |
| D Vitamini | 1.5 µg | — | — |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 2.32 mg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 24 mg | 84 mg | +250.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 7 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 24 mg | 113 mg | +370.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0.3 g | 4.65 g | +1450.0% |
| Kolesterol | 215 mg | 10 mg | -95.3% |
| Kül | 0.15 g | 0.72 g | +380.0% |
| Laktoz | 0.25 g | 4.81 g | +1824.0% |
| Magnezyum | — | 10 mg | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 19.8 g | — | — |
| Potasyum | 24 mg | 132 mg | +450.0% |
| Protein | 0.85 g | 3.28 g | +285.9% |
| Retinol | 671 µg | — | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 21.5 g | — | — |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 3.25 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 11 mg | 40 mg | +263.6% |
| Su | 17.2 g | 88.13 g | +412.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 51.3 g | 1.86 g | -96.4% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 21 g | 0.81 g | -96.1% |
| Toplam yağ | 81.5 g | 3.25 g | -96.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.05 g | 0.12 g | -96.1% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.25 g | 4.81 g | +1824.0% |
| Çinko | 0.09 mg | 0.38 mg | +322.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Tuzsuz Yayık Tereyağı and A2 sütü.
A2 sütü has less energy per 100 g (61 kcal versus 720 kcal).
For measured Laktoz, Tuzsuz Yayık Tereyağı has 0.25 g and A2 sütü has 4.81 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Tuzsuz Yayık Tereyağı 2, A2 sütü 34.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.