Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
148 kcal
Score
20 / 100
Tonkatsu and Aleesa have the same nutrition score (20).
Energy Diff
312 vs 148(-52.6%)
Score Diff
20 vs 20(0.0%)
Higher energy
Tonkatsu
Score leader
Score is equal
Nutrient split
14 - 6 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Tonkatsu and Aleesa are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Tonkatsu has 312.0 kcal and Aleesa has 148.0 kcal. The difference is 164.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 20 and 20. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Tonkatsu | Aleesa | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.62 mg | 0.12 mg | -80.6% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.58 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.19 mg | 0.08 mg | -57.9% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.36 mg | 0.14 mg | -61.1% |
| Demir | 1.25 mg | 1.2 mg | -4.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.9 g | 2.1 g | +133.3% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 148 kcal | — |
| Fosfor | 195 mg | 115 mg | -41.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 18 mg | 24 mg | +33.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 11.5 g | 18.5 g | +60.9% |
| Kolesterol | 62 mg | 18 mg | -71.0% |
| Kül | 1.1 g | 1.2 g | +9.1% |
| Magnezyum | 22 mg | 34 mg | +54.5% |
| Niasin | 5.4 mg | 2.3 mg | -57.4% |
| Potasyum | 265 mg | 185 mg | -30.2% |
| Protein | 18.4 g | 8.5 g | -53.8% |
| Selenyum | 24.6 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 310 mg | 275 mg | -11.3% |
| Su | 47.8 g | 68.2 g | +42.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 5.8 g | 1.4 g | -75.9% |
| Toplam Folat | 19 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 9.4 g | 1.5 g | -84.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 21.2 g | 4.2 g | -80.2% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.1 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 0.4 g | — |
| Çinko | 2.15 mg | 1.1 mg | -48.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Tonkatsu and Aleesa.
Aleesa has less energy per 100 g (148 kcal versus 312 kcal).
For measured Diyet lifi, Tonkatsu has 0.9 g and Aleesa has 2.1 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Tonkatsu 20, Aleesa 20.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.