Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
438.5 kcal
Score
8 / 100
Tharid has a higher nutrition quality score (46) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
158.4 vs 438.5(+176.8%)
Score Diff
46 vs 8(-82.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Tharid
Higher energy
Anarsa
Score leader
Tharid
Nutrient split
9 - 7 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Tharid and Anarsa are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Tharid has 158.4 kcal and Anarsa has 438.5 kcal. The difference is 280.1 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 46 and 8. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Tharid | Anarsa | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.12 mg | 0.08 mg | -33.3% |
| B12 Vitamini | 1.15 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.16 mg | 0.05 mg | -68.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.21 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 1.85 mg | 2.15 mg | +16.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.6 g | 2.4 g | +50.0% |
| Fosfor | 115 mg | 115 mg | 0.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 28.4 mg | 92 mg | +223.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 15.1 g | 68.5 g | +353.6% |
| Kolesterol | 26.5 mg | — | — |
| Kül | 1.5 g | 1 g | -33.3% |
| Magnezyum | 22 mg | 42 mg | +90.9% |
| Niasin | 3.4 mg | 1.25 mg | -63.2% |
| Potasyum | 245 mg | 138 mg | -43.7% |
| Protein | 9.2 g | 4.6 g | -50.0% |
| Sodyum | 380.5 mg | 14 mg | -96.3% |
| Su | 65.8 g | 7.3 g | -88.9% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.75 g | 6.1 g | +121.8% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 5.7 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 6.8 g | 16.2 g | +138.2% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 3.4 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 31.8 g | — |
| Çinko | 2.15 mg | 0.85 mg | -60.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Tharid and Anarsa.
Tharid has less energy per 100 g (158.4 kcal versus 438.5 kcal).
For measured Karbonhidrat (farkla), Tharid has 15.1 g and Anarsa has 68.5 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Tharid 46, Anarsa 8.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Tharid · Anarsa · Methodology
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.