Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
275 kcal
Score
14 / 100
Tengkleng has a higher nutrition quality score (51) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
135 vs 275(+103.7%)
Score Diff
51 vs 14(-72.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Tengkleng
Higher energy
Amritsari kulcha
Score leader
Tengkleng
Nutrient split
5 - 12 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Tengkleng and Amritsari kulcha are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Tengkleng has 135.0 kcal and Amritsari kulcha has 275.0 kcal. The difference is 140.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 51 and 14. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Tengkleng | Amritsari kulcha | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 15 µg | 35 µg | +133.3% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.08 mg | 0.22 mg | +175.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | 1.1 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.14 mg | 0.15 mg | +7.1% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.18 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 2.5 mg | 6.5 mg | +160.0% |
| Demir | 1.8 mg | 2.1 mg | +16.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.8 g | 2.8 g | +250.0% |
| Folat DFE | — | 45 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 110 mg | 110 mg | 0.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 25 mg | 45 mg | +80.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | — | 38.5 g | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | 4.5 g | — | — |
| Kolesterol | 35 mg | — | — |
| Kül | — | 1.5 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 18 mg | 28 mg | +55.6% |
| Niasin | 2.4 mg | 2.1 mg | -12.5% |
| Potasyum | 230 mg | 210 mg | -8.7% |
| Protein | 10.5 g | 6.5 g | -38.1% |
| Sodyum | 420 mg | 480 mg | +14.3% |
| Su | 78.5 g | 40.2 g | -48.8% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 3.8 g | 5.2 g | +36.8% |
| Toplam yağ | 8.2 g | 10.5 g | +28.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.2 g | 1.8 g | +50.0% |
| Çinko | 2.1 mg | 0.8 mg | -61.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Tengkleng and Amritsari kulcha.
Tengkleng has less energy per 100 g (135 kcal versus 275 kcal).
For measured Diyet lifi, Tengkleng has 0.8 g and Amritsari kulcha has 2.8 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Tengkleng 51, Amritsari kulcha 14.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.