Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
438.5 kcal
Score
8 / 100
Temakizushi has a higher nutrition quality score (41) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
151.8 vs 438.5(+188.9%)
Score Diff
41 vs 8(-80.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Temakizushi
Higher energy
Anarsa
Score leader
Temakizushi
Nutrient split
4 - 12 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Temakizushi and Anarsa are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Temakizushi has 151.8 kcal and Anarsa has 438.5 kcal. The difference is 286.7 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 41 and 8. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Temakizushi | Anarsa | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 35 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.08 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 1.1 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.05 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | 1.5 µg | — | — |
| Demir | 0.85 mg | 2.15 mg | +152.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.4 g | 2.4 g | +71.4% |
| Fosfor | 85 mg | 115 mg | +35.3% |
| İyot | 68 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 18 mg | 92 mg | +411.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 25.4 g | 68.5 g | +169.7% |
| Kolesterol | 14 mg | — | — |
| Kül | — | 1 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 22 mg | 42 mg | +90.9% |
| Niasin | — | 1.25 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 185 mg | 138 mg | -25.4% |
| Protein | 6.2 g | 4.6 g | -25.8% |
| Selenyum | 12.4 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 340 mg | 14 mg | -95.9% |
| Su | 63.5 g | 7.3 g | -88.5% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.6 g | 6.1 g | +916.7% |
| Toplam Folat | 28 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.9 g | 5.7 g | +533.3% |
| Toplam yağ | 2.8 g | 16.2 g | +478.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.1 g | 3.4 g | +209.1% |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.8 g | 31.8 g | +1035.7% |
| Çinko | 0.72 mg | 0.85 mg | +18.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Temakizushi and Anarsa.
Temakizushi has less energy per 100 g (151.8 kcal versus 438.5 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Temakizushi has 2.8 g and Anarsa has 31.8 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Temakizushi 41, Anarsa 8.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.