Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
89 kcal
Score
29 / 100
Taze Muz has a higher nutrition quality score (30) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
89 vs 89(0.0%)
Score Diff
30 vs 29(-3.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Taze Muz
Higher energy
Energy is equal
Score leader
Taze Muz
Nutrient split
0 - 0 (tie: 16)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Taze Muz and Muz are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Taze Muz has 89.0 kcal and Muz has 89.0 kcal. The difference is 0.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 30 and 29. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Taze Muz | Muz | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.031 mg | 0.031 mg | 0.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.073 mg | 0.073 mg | 0.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.367 mg | 0.367 mg | 0.0% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 8.7 mg | 8.7 mg | 0.0% |
| Demir | 0.26 mg | 0.26 mg | 0.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.6 g | 2.6 g | 0.0% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 89 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | 20 µg | 20 µg | 0.0% |
| Fosfor | 22 mg | 22 mg | 0.0% |
| Fruktoz | 4.85 g | — | — |
| Glikoz | 4.98 g | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 5 mg | 5 mg | 0.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 22.84 g | — | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | — | 22.84 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 27 mg | 27 mg | 0.0% |
| Mangan | — | 0.27 mg | — |
| Niasin | 0.665 mg | 0.665 mg | 0.0% |
| Potasyum | 358 mg | 358 mg | 0.0% |
| Protein | 1.09 g | 1.09 g | 0.0% |
| Sakkaroz | 2.39 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 1 mg | — | — |
| Su | 74.91 g | 74.91 g | 0.0% |
| Toplam Kolin | — | 9.8 mg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.33 g | 0.33 g | 0.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 12.23 g | 12.23 g | 0.0% |
| Çinko | 0.15 mg | — | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Taze Muz and Muz.
The records show 89 kcal per 100 g for both foods.
For measured B1 Vitamini (Tiamin), Taze Muz has 0.031 mg and Muz has 0.031 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Taze Muz 30, Muz 29.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Taze Muz · Muz · Methodology
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.