Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
81 kcal
Score
62 / 100
Taze Kekik has a higher nutrition quality score (93) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
101 vs 81(-19.8%)
Score Diff
93 vs 62(-33.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Taze Kekik
Higher energy
Taze Kekik
Score leader
Taze Kekik
Nutrient split
15 - 5 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Taze Kekik and Araka are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Taze Kekik has 101.0 kcal and Araka has 81.0 kcal. The difference is 20.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 93 and 62. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Taze Kekik | Araka | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 238 µg | 38 µg | -84.0% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.05 mg | 0.266 mg | +432.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.47 mg | 0.132 mg | -71.9% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.35 mg | 0.169 mg | -51.7% |
| Bakir | 0.55 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 2851 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 160.1 mg | 40 mg | -75.0% |
| Demir | 17.45 mg | 1.47 mg | -91.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 14 g | 5.7 g | -59.3% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 0.13 mg | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 101 kcal | — | — |
| Fosfor | 106 mg | 108 mg | +1.9% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1714.8 µg | 24.8 µg | -98.6% |
| Kalsiyum | 405 mg | 25 mg | -93.8% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 24.45 g | 14.45 g | -40.9% |
| Kül | 3.2 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 160 mg | 33 mg | -79.4% |
| Mangan | 1.72 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 1.82 mg | 2.09 mg | +14.8% |
| Potasyum | 601 mg | 244 mg | -59.4% |
| Protein | 5.56 g | 5.42 g | -2.5% |
| Sodyum | 9 mg | 5 mg | -44.4% |
| Su | 65.11 g | 78.86 g | +21.1% |
| Toplam Folat | 45 µg | 65 µg | +44.4% |
| Toplam yağ | 1.68 g | 0.4 g | -76.2% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 5.67 g | — |
| Çinko | 1.81 mg | 1.24 mg | -31.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Taze Kekik and Araka.
Araka has less energy per 100 g (81 kcal versus 101 kcal).
For measured B1 Vitamini (Tiamin), Taze Kekik has 0.05 mg and Araka has 0.266 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Taze Kekik 93, Araka 62.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.