Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
28 kcal
Score
71 / 100
Taze Kekik has a higher nutrition quality score (93) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
101 vs 28(-72.3%)
Score Diff
93 vs 71(-23.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Taze Kekik
Higher energy
Taze Kekik
Score leader
Taze Kekik
Nutrient split
17 - 1 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Taze Kekik and Afrika patlıcanı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Taze Kekik has 101.0 kcal and Afrika patlıcanı has 28.0 kcal. The difference is 73.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 93 and 71. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Taze Kekik | Afrika patlıcanı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 238 µg | 5 µg | -97.9% |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.05 mg | 0.05 mg | 0.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.47 mg | 0.04 mg | -91.5% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.35 mg | 0.08 mg | -77.1% |
| Bakir | 0.55 mg | — | — |
| Beta Karoten | 2851 µg | 60 µg | -97.9% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 160.1 mg | 5 mg | -96.9% |
| Demir | 17.45 mg | 0.6 mg | -96.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 14 g | 2.5 g | -82.1% |
| Enerji | — | 117 kj | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 101 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 22 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 106 mg | 24 mg | -77.4% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1714.8 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 405 mg | 18 mg | -95.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 24.45 g | 5.9 g | -75.9% |
| Kül | 3.2 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 160 mg | 16 mg | -90.0% |
| Mangan | 1.72 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 1.82 mg | 0.6 mg | -67.0% |
| Potasyum | 601 mg | 230 mg | -61.7% |
| Protein | 5.56 g | 1.2 g | -78.4% |
| Sodyum | 9 mg | 3 mg | -66.7% |
| Su | 65.11 g | 91.2 g | +40.1% |
| Toplam Folat | 45 µg | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 1.68 g | 0.2 g | -88.1% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 2.8 g | — |
| Çinko | 1.81 mg | 0.17 mg | -90.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Taze Kekik and Afrika patlıcanı.
Afrika patlıcanı has less energy per 100 g (28 kcal versus 101 kcal).
For measured A Vitamini (RAE), Taze Kekik has 238 µg and Afrika patlıcanı has 5 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Taze Kekik 93, Afrika patlıcanı 71.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.