Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
142 kcal
Score
22 / 100
Tanjia has a higher nutrition quality score (56) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
187 vs 142(-24.1%)
Score Diff
56 vs 22(-60.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Tanjia
Higher energy
Tanjia
Score leader
Tanjia
Nutrient split
11 - 6 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Tanjia and Agedashi tofu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Tanjia has 187.0 kcal and Agedashi tofu has 142.0 kcal. The difference is 45.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 56 and 22. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Tanjia | Agedashi tofu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.07 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 2.15 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.05 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.35 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 1.8 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 2.5 mg | 1.42 mg | -43.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.4 g | 0.8 g | +100.0% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 1.25 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 23 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 195 mg | 98 mg | -49.7% |
| Kalsiyum | 22 mg | 145 mg | +559.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 1.2 g | 8.1 g | +575.0% |
| Kolesterol | 68 mg | — | — |
| Kül | 1.4 g | 1.3 g | -7.1% |
| Magnezyum | 21 mg | 46 mg | +119.0% |
| Niasin | 4.6 mg | 0.42 mg | -90.9% |
| Potasyum | 320 mg | 165 mg | -48.4% |
| Protein | 20.4 g | 8.2 g | -59.8% |
| Selenyum | 24.2 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 485 mg | 410 mg | -15.5% |
| Su | 65.8 g | 73.8 g | +12.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 4.5 g | 1.32 g | -70.7% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 5.1 g | 2.45 g | -52.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 11.2 g | 8.6 g | -23.2% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.6 g | 4.38 g | +630.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 1.8 g | — |
| Çinko | 4.8 mg | 0.82 mg | -82.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Tanjia and Agedashi tofu.
Agedashi tofu has less energy per 100 g (142 kcal versus 187 kcal).
For measured Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri, Tanjia has 0.6 g and Agedashi tofu has 4.38 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Tanjia 56, Agedashi tofu 22.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.