Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Tam Buğday Ekmeği has a higher nutrition quality score (21) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
260 vs 342(+31.5%)
Score Diff
21 vs 16(-23.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Tam Buğday Ekmeği
Higher energy
Ekmek Çubukları
Score leader
Tam Buğday Ekmeği
Nutrient split
10 - 8 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Tam Buğday Ekmeği and Ekmek Çubukları are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Tam Buğday Ekmeği has 260.0 kcal and Ekmek Çubukları has 342.0 kcal. The difference is 82.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 21 and 16. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Tam Buğday Ekmeği | Ekmek Çubukları | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 24 µg | — |
| Alfa Karoten | — | 0 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.3 mg | 0.49 mg | +63.3% |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 0.13 µg | — |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | — | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.2 mg | 0.56 mg | +180.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.15 mg | 0.1 mg | -33.3% |
| Bakir | — | 0.11 mg | — |
| Besin folati | — | 24 µg | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 7 µg | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | — | 0 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 0 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | — | 0 µg | — |
| Demir | 2.5 mg | 4.64 mg | +85.6% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 7 g | 2.4 g | -65.7% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 0.88 mg | — |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | — | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | — | 342 kj | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 260 kcal | — | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | — | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 50 µg | 233 µg | +366.0% |
| Folik asit | — | 123 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 200 mg | 129 mg | -35.5% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 21.1 µg | — |
| Kafein | — | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 100 mg | 87 mg | -13.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | — | 44.39 g | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | 45 g | — | — |
| Kolesterol | — | 7 mg | — |
| Likopen | — | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | — | 10 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 80 mg | 22 mg | -72.5% |
| Mangan | 1 mg | — | — |
| MUFA 16:1 | — | 0.07 g | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | — | 2.62 g | — |
| MUFA 20:1 | — | 0.05 g | — |
| MUFA 22:1 | — | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 4 mg | 7.07 mg | +76.8% |
| Potasyum | 250 mg | 132 mg | -47.2% |
| Protein | 10 g | 12.18 g | +21.8% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | — | 5.4 g | — |
| PUFA 18:3 | — | 0.72 g | — |
| PUFA 18:4 | — | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | — | 0.01 g | — |
| Retinol | — | 23 µg | — |
| Selenyum | 30 µg | 22 µg | -26.7% |
| SFA 10:0 | — | 0.04 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | — | 0.06 g | — |
| SFA 14:0 | — | 0.22 g | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | — | 1.77 g | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | — | 0.67 g | — |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | — | 0.04 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | — | 0.03 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | — | 0.02 g | — |
| Sodyum | 400 mg | 615 mg | +53.8% |
| Su | 35 g | 28.32 g | -19.1% |
| Teobromin | — | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 2.96 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 147 µg | — |
| Toplam Kolin | — | 7.5 mg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 2.77 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 3.5 g | 12.85 g | +267.1% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 6.15 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 5 g | 1.11 g | -77.8% |
| Çinko | 1.5 mg | 1.02 mg | -32.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Tam Buğday Ekmeği and Ekmek Çubukları.
Tam Buğday Ekmeği has less energy per 100 g (260 kcal versus 342 kcal).
For measured Folat DFE, Tam Buğday Ekmeği has 50 µg and Ekmek Çubukları has 233 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Tam Buğday Ekmeği 21, Ekmek Çubukları 16.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.