Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
142 kcal
Score
22 / 100
Takowasa has a higher nutrition quality score (64) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
79 vs 142(+79.8%)
Score Diff
64 vs 22(-65.6%)
OVERALL WINNER
Takowasa
Higher energy
Agedashi tofu
Score leader
Takowasa
Nutrient split
9 - 6 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Takowasa and Agedashi tofu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Takowasa has 79.0 kcal and Agedashi tofu has 142.0 kcal. The difference is 63.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 64 and 22. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
15 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Takowasa | Agedashi tofu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.07 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | 2.1 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.05 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.08 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.42 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 3.5 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 1.4 mg | 1.42 mg | +1.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 0.3 g | 0.8 g | +166.7% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 1.25 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 23 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 165 mg | 98 mg | -40.6% |
| Kalsiyum | 38 mg | 145 mg | +281.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 4.2 g | 8.1 g | +92.9% |
| Kolesterol | 48 mg | — | — |
| Kül | 2.5 g | 1.3 g | -48.0% |
| Magnezyum | 32 mg | 46 mg | +43.8% |
| Niasin | 2.1 mg | 0.42 mg | -80.0% |
| Potasyum | 260 mg | 165 mg | -36.5% |
| Protein | 13.5 g | 8.2 g | -39.3% |
| Selenyum | 28.5 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 1050 mg | 410 mg | -61.0% |
| Su | 78.9 g | 73.8 g | -6.5% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 1.32 g | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 2.45 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.9 g | 8.6 g | +855.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 4.38 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.5 g | 1.8 g | -28.0% |
| Çinko | 1.6 mg | 0.82 mg | -48.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Takowasa and Agedashi tofu.
Takowasa has less energy per 100 g (79 kcal versus 142 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Takowasa has 0.9 g and Agedashi tofu has 8.6 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Takowasa 64, Agedashi tofu 22.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.