Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
253 kcal
Score
3 / 100
Tahin Helvası, Sade has a higher nutrition quality score (17) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
541 vs 253(-53.2%)
Score Diff
17 vs 3(-82.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Tahin Helvası, Sade
Higher energy
Tahin Helvası, Sade
Score leader
Tahin Helvası, Sade
Nutrient split
16 - 3 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Tahin Helvası, Sade and Ananas Sosu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Tahin Helvası, Sade has 541.0 kcal and Ananas Sosu has 253.0 kcal. The difference is 288.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 17 and 3. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Tahin Helvası, Sade | Ananas Sosu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | — | 17 iu | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 1 µg | — |
| Alfa Karoten | — | 0 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.04 mg | — |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 0 µg | — |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | — | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.02 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.03 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.8 mg | 0.05 mg | -93.8% |
| Besin folati | — | 2 µg | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 10 µg | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | — | 0 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 3.1 mg | — |
| D Vitamini | — | 0 µg | — |
| D Vitamini (IU) | — | 0 iu | — |
| Demir | 4.2 mg | 0.12 mg | -97.1% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 4.5 g | 0.4 g | -91.1% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 0.01 mg | — |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | — | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | — | 1059 kj | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 541 kcal | — | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | — | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 2 µg | — |
| Folik asit | — | 0 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 350 mg | 3 mg | -99.1% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 0.2 µg | — |
| Kafein | — | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 145 mg | 6 mg | -95.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 47 g | 66.4 g | +41.3% |
| Kolesterol | — | 0 mg | — |
| Kül | 2.2 g | 0.4 g | -81.8% |
| Likopen | — | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | — | 0 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 118 mg | 6 mg | -94.9% |
| Mangan | 1.2 mg | 0.07 mg | -94.2% |
| MUFA 16:1 | — | 0 g | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | — | 0.03 g | — |
| MUFA 20:1 | — | 0 g | — |
| MUFA 22:1 | — | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | — | 0.1 mg | — |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 0.01 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 280 mg | 43 mg | -84.6% |
| Protein | 12.8 g | 0.1 g | -99.2% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | — | 0.05 g | — |
| PUFA 18:3 | — | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 18:4 | — | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | — | 0 g | — |
| Retinol | — | 0 µg | — |
| Selenyum | — | 0.7 µg | — |
| SFA 10:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 14:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | — | 0.02 g | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| Sodyum | 12 mg | 42 mg | +250.0% |
| Su | 4.5 g | 33 g | +633.3% |
| Teobromin | — | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 4.8 g | 0.02 g | -99.6% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 2 µg | — |
| Toplam Kolin | — | 1.6 mg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 13.2 g | 0.03 g | -99.8% |
| Toplam yağ | 33.5 g | 0.1 g | -99.7% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 14.5 g | 0.05 g | -99.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | 42.1 g | 21.01 g | -50.1% |
| Çinko | 3.1 mg | 0.05 mg | -98.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Tahin Helvası, Sade and Ananas Sosu.
Ananas Sosu has less energy per 100 g (253 kcal versus 541 kcal).
For measured Su, Tahin Helvası, Sade has 4.5 g and Ananas Sosu has 33 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Tahin Helvası, Sade 17, Ananas Sosu 3.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.