Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
314 kcal
Score
42 / 100
Arı Poleni has a higher nutrition quality score (42) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
648.4 vs 314(-51.6%)
Score Diff
30 vs 42(+40.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Arı Poleni
Higher energy
Susam Tereyağı, Kremalı
Score leader
Arı Poleni
Nutrient split
8 - 10 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Susam Tereyağı, Kremalı and Arı Poleni are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Susam Tereyağı, Kremalı has 648.4 kcal and Arı Poleni has 314.0 kcal. The difference is 334.4 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 30 and 42. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Susam Tereyağı, Kremalı | Arı Poleni | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALA (18:3 n-3) | 0.25 g | — | — |
| Alanin | 1.17 g | — | — |
| Arjinin | 3.14 g | — | — |
| Aspartik asit | 2.06 g | — | — |
| Azot | 3.72 g | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.99 mg | 0.9 mg | -9.1% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.6 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.6 mg | 0.9 mg | +50.0% |
| Bakir | 1.65 mg | 1.1 mg | -33.3% |
| Biyotin | 13.31 µg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 20 mg | — |
| Daydzein | 1.52 mg | — | — |
| Daydzin | 0.41 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 7 mg | 9 mg | +28.6% |
| Diyet lifi | 8.37 g | 12 g | +43.4% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0 mg | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 697.14 kcal | 314 kcal | -55.0% |
| Enerji (Atwater Özel Faktörleri) | 648.37 kcal | — | — |
| Fenilalanin | 1.12 g | — | — |
| Fosfor | 719.3 mg | 600 mg | -16.6% |
| Genistein | 0 mg | — | — |
| Genistin | 0 mg | — | — |
| Glisin | 1.23 g | — | — |
| Glisitin | 0.17 mg | — | — |
| Glutamik asit | 5.05 g | — | — |
| Hidroksiprolin | 0.04 g | — | — |
| Histidin | 0.62 g | — | — |
| Izolosin | 0.86 g | — | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 1.71 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 115.8 mg | 120 mg | +3.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 14.18 g | 40 g | +182.1% |
| Kül | 3.11 g | 3 g | -3.5% |
| Lizin | 0.67 g | — | — |
| Losin | 1.65 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 356.8 mg | — | — |
| Mangan | 1.61 mg | 4.5 mg | +179.5% |
| Metiyonin | 0.74 g | — | — |
| MUFA 18:1 c | 22.37 g | — | — |
| MUFA 20:1 c | 0.12 g | — | — |
| Niasin | 5.81 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 407.7 mg | 600 mg | +47.2% |
| Prolin | 0.93 g | — | — |
| Protein | 19.71 g | 24 g | +21.8% |
| PUFA 18:2 n-6 c,c | 26.11 g | — | — |
| Selenyum | 46.48 µg | — | — |
| Serin | 1.15 g | — | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 5.32 g | — | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 3.1 g | — | — |
| SFA 20:0 | 0.36 g | — | — |
| Sistein | 0.75 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 63.63 mg | 30 mg | -52.9% |
| Su | 0.61 g | 10 g | +1539.3% |
| Tirozin | 0.84 g | — | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 8.97 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 108.4 µg | 500 µg | +361.3% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 22.57 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 62.4 g | 5 g | -92.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 26.37 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 30 g | — |
| Treonin | 0.92 g | — | — |
| Triptofan | 0.31 g | — | — |
| Valin | 1.1 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 6.04 mg | 4 mg | -33.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Susam Tereyağı, Kremalı and Arı Poleni.
Arı Poleni has less energy per 100 g (314 kcal versus 648.4 kcal).
For measured Su, Susam Tereyağı, Kremalı has 0.61 g and Arı Poleni has 10 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Susam Tereyağı, Kremalı 30, Arı Poleni 42.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.