Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
386 kcal
Score
38 / 100
Soya Fasulyesi has a higher nutrition quality score (58) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
446 vs 386(-13.5%)
Score Diff
58 vs 38(-34.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Soya Fasulyesi
Higher energy
Soya Fasulyesi
Score leader
Soya Fasulyesi
Nutrient split
17 - 5 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Soya Fasulyesi and Amarant unu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Soya Fasulyesi has 446.0 kcal and Amarant unu has 386.0 kcal. The difference is 60.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 58 and 38. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
22 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Soya Fasulyesi | Amarant unu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.87 mg | 0.116 mg | -86.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.87 mg | 0.2 mg | -77.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.38 mg | 0.587 mg | +54.5% |
| Bakir | 1.66 mg | 0.525 mg | -68.4% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 6 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 15.7 mg | 7.61 mg | -51.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 9.3 g | 6.7 g | -28.0% |
| Folat DFE | — | 49 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 704 mg | 557 mg | -20.9% |
| Kalsiyum | 277 mg | 159 mg | -42.6% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 30.16 g | 66.17 g | +119.4% |
| Kül | 4.87 g | 2.48 g | -49.1% |
| Magnezyum | 280 mg | 248 mg | -11.4% |
| Mangan | 2.52 mg | 3.33 mg | +32.1% |
| Niasin | 1.62 mg | 0.923 mg | -43.0% |
| Potasyum | 1797 mg | 508 mg | -71.7% |
| Protein | 36.49 g | 14.45 g | -60.4% |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | 21 mg | +950.0% |
| Su | 8.54 g | 11.1 g | +30.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.88 g | 1.46 g | -49.3% |
| Toplam Folat | 375 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.4 g | 1.69 g | -61.6% |
| Toplam yağ | 19.94 g | 6.51 g | -67.4% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 11.26 g | 2.78 g | -75.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 1.7 g | — |
| Çinko | 4.89 mg | 2.87 mg | -41.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Soya Fasulyesi and Amarant unu.
Amarant unu has less energy per 100 g (386 kcal versus 446 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Soya Fasulyesi has 2 mg and Amarant unu has 21 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Soya Fasulyesi 58, Amarant unu 38.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.