Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
329 kcal
Score
41 / 100
Soya Fasulyesi has a higher nutrition quality score (58) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
446 vs 329(-26.2%)
Score Diff
58 vs 41(-29.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Soya Fasulyesi
Higher energy
Soya Fasulyesi
Score leader
Soya Fasulyesi
Nutrient split
13 - 7 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Soya Fasulyesi and Adzuki fasulyesi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Soya Fasulyesi has 446.0 kcal and Adzuki fasulyesi has 329.0 kcal. The difference is 117.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 58 and 41. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Soya Fasulyesi | Adzuki fasulyesi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.87 mg | 0.455 mg | -47.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.87 mg | 0.22 mg | -74.7% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.38 mg | 0.351 mg | -7.6% |
| Bakir | 1.66 mg | 1.09 mg | -34.3% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 6 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 15.7 mg | 4.98 mg | -68.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 9.3 g | 12.7 g | +36.6% |
| Fosfor | 704 mg | 381 mg | -45.9% |
| Kalsiyum | 277 mg | 66 mg | -76.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 30.16 g | 62.96 g | +108.8% |
| Kül | 4.87 g | 3.82 g | -21.6% |
| Magnezyum | 280 mg | 127 mg | -54.6% |
| Mangan | 2.52 mg | 1.73 mg | -31.3% |
| Niasin | 1.62 mg | 2.63 mg | +62.3% |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 1.47 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 1797 mg | 1254 mg | -30.2% |
| Protein | 36.49 g | 19.87 g | -45.5% |
| Selenyum | — | 3.2 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | 5 mg | +150.0% |
| Su | 8.54 g | 16.32 g | +91.1% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 2.88 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | 375 µg | 622 µg | +65.9% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.4 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 19.94 g | 0.53 g | -97.3% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 11.26 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 4.89 mg | 5.04 mg | +3.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Soya Fasulyesi and Adzuki fasulyesi.
Adzuki fasulyesi has less energy per 100 g (329 kcal versus 446 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Soya Fasulyesi has 2 mg and Adzuki fasulyesi has 5 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Soya Fasulyesi 58, Adzuki fasulyesi 41.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.