Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
368 kcal
Score
32 / 100
Altın kinoa has a higher nutrition quality score (32) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
329 vs 368(+11.8%)
Score Diff
26 vs 32(+23.1%)
OVERALL WINNER
Altın kinoa
Higher energy
Altın kinoa
Score leader
Altın kinoa
Nutrient split
4 - 16 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Sorgum Tahılı and Altın kinoa are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Sorgum Tahılı has 329.0 kcal and Altın kinoa has 368.0 kcal. The difference is 39.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 26 and 32. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Sorgum Tahılı | Altın kinoa | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.332 mg | 0.36 mg | +8.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.142 mg | 0.32 mg | +125.4% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.443 mg | 0.49 mg | +10.6% |
| Bakir | 0.284 mg | 0.59 mg | +107.7% |
| Demir | 3.36 mg | 4.57 mg | +36.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 6.7 g | 7 g | +4.5% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 2.44 mg | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 368 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | 20 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 289 mg | 457 mg | +58.1% |
| Kalsiyum | 13 mg | 47 mg | +261.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 72.09 g | 64.16 g | -11.0% |
| Kül | 1.43 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 165 mg | 197 mg | +19.4% |
| Mangan | 1.625 mg | 2 mg | +23.1% |
| Niasin | 3.688 mg | 1.52 mg | -58.8% |
| Pantotenik asit | 0.367 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 363 mg | 563 mg | +55.1% |
| Protein | 10.62 g | 14.12 g | +33.0% |
| Selenyum | 12.2 µg | 8.5 µg | -30.3% |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | 5 mg | +150.0% |
| Su | 12.4 g | 13.28 g | +7.1% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.61 g | — | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 184 µg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.13 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 3.46 g | 6.07 g | +75.4% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.56 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 2.53 g | 0.1 g | -96.0% |
| Çinko | 1.67 mg | 3.1 mg | +85.6% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Sorgum Tahılı and Altın kinoa.
Sorgum Tahılı has less energy per 100 g (329 kcal versus 368 kcal).
For measured Kalsiyum, Sorgum Tahılı has 13 mg and Altın kinoa has 47 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Sorgum Tahılı 26, Altın kinoa 32.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.