Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
629 kcal
Score
27 / 100
Alp fıstığı has a higher nutrition quality score (27) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
884 vs 629(-28.8%)
Score Diff
0 vs 27(+100.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Alp fıstığı
Higher energy
Soğuk Sıkım Zeytinyağı
Score leader
Alp fıstığı
Nutrient split
4 - 8 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Soğuk Sıkım Zeytinyağı and Alp fıstığı are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Soğuk Sıkım Zeytinyağı has 884.0 kcal and Alp fıstığı has 629.0 kcal. The difference is 255.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 0 and 27. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
13 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Soğuk Sıkım Zeytinyağı | Alp fıstığı | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALA (18:3 n-3) | 0.76 g | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.36 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.23 mg | — |
| Beta-sitosterol | 184 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 0.8 mg | — |
| Demir | 0.56 mg | 5.5 mg | +882.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 3.7 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 14.35 mg | 9.3 mg | -35.2% |
| Fitosteroller | 221 mg | — | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 34 µg | — |
| Fosfor | — | 575 mg | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 60.2 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 1 mg | 16 mg | +1500.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | 13.1 g | — |
| Magnezyum | — | 251 mg | — |
| Mangan | — | 8.8 mg | — |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.82 g | — | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 71.27 g | — | — |
| Niasin | — | 4.3 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 1 mg | 597 mg | +59600.0% |
| Protein | 0 g | 13.7 g | — |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 9.76 g | — | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 11 g | — | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 2.15 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | 2 mg | 0.0% |
| Su | 0.2 g | 5.3 g | +2550.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 13.81 g | 4.9 g | -64.5% |
| Toplam Kolin | 0.3 mg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 72.96 g | 18.8 g | -74.2% |
| Toplam yağ | 100 g | 68.4 g | -31.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 10.52 g | 34.1 g | +224.1% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0 g | — | — |
| Çinko | — | 6.4 mg | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Soğuk Sıkım Zeytinyağı and Alp fıstığı.
Alp fıstığı has less energy per 100 g (629 kcal versus 884 kcal).
For measured Potasyum, Soğuk Sıkım Zeytinyağı has 1 mg and Alp fıstığı has 597 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Soğuk Sıkım Zeytinyağı 0, Alp fıstığı 27.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.