Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
305 kcal
Score
62 / 100
Ajwain Tohumu (Piskopos Otu) has a higher nutrition quality score (62) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
114 vs 305(+167.5%)
Score Diff
0 vs 62(+100.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Ajwain Tohumu (Piskopos Otu)
Higher energy
Ajwain Tohumu (Piskopos Otu)
Score leader
Ajwain Tohumu (Piskopos Otu)
Nutrient split
2 - 14 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Soğanlı tuz and Ajwain Tohumu (Piskopos Otu) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Soğanlı tuz has 114.0 kcal and Ajwain Tohumu (Piskopos Otu) has 305.0 kcal. The difference is 191.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 0 and 62. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Soğanlı tuz | Ajwain Tohumu (Piskopos Otu) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 7 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.09 mg | 0.21 mg | +133.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.04 mg | 0.28 mg | +600.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.32 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 3.2 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 1.1 mg | 12.6 mg | +1045.5% |
| Diyet lifi | 4 g | 38.8 g | +870.0% |
| Enerji | 477 kj | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 18 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 85 mg | 350 mg | +311.8% |
| Kalsiyum | 95 mg | 1525 mg | +1505.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 25.1 g | 43 g | +71.3% |
| Kül | 67.05 g | 7.8 g | -88.4% |
| Magnezyum | 28 mg | 240 mg | +757.1% |
| Mangan | 0.28 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | — | 2.1 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 370 mg | 1390 mg | +275.7% |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 16 g | +344.4% |
| Sodyum | 26200 mg | 10 mg | -100.0% |
| Su | 3.9 g | 7.4 g | +89.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.08 g | 1.6 g | +1900.0% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 13.8 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.35 g | 25 g | +7042.9% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 8.2 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 11.2 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.45 mg | 3.3 mg | +633.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Soğanlı tuz and Ajwain Tohumu (Piskopos Otu).
Soğanlı tuz has less energy per 100 g (114 kcal versus 305 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Soğanlı tuz has 0.35 g and Ajwain Tohumu (Piskopos Otu) has 25 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Soğanlı tuz 0, Ajwain Tohumu (Piskopos Otu) 62.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.