Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
354 kcal
Score
4 / 100
Sirutteok has a higher nutrition quality score (13) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
218 vs 354(+62.4%)
Score Diff
13 vs 4(-69.2%)
OVERALL WINNER
Sirutteok
Higher energy
Zalabya
Score leader
Sirutteok
Nutrient split
13 - 6 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Sirutteok and Zalabya are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Sirutteok has 218.0 kcal and Zalabya has 354.0 kcal. The difference is 136.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 13 and 4. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Sirutteok | Zalabya | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.11 mg | 0.08 mg | -27.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.04 mg | 0.05 mg | +25.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.09 mg | — | — |
| Bakir | 0.16 mg | — | — |
| Demir | 1.25 mg | 1.1 mg | -12.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 3.6 g | 1.2 g | -66.7% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 2.1 mg | — |
| Enerji | — | 1481 kj | — |
| Fosfor | 85 mg | 45 mg | -47.1% |
| Kalsiyum | 24 mg | 18 mg | -25.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 46.5 g | 56.5 g | +21.5% |
| Kül | 1 g | 1.2 g | +20.0% |
| Magnezyum | 28 mg | 12 mg | -57.1% |
| Mangan | 0.52 mg | — | — |
| Niasin | 1.15 mg | 0.9 mg | -21.7% |
| Potasyum | 210 mg | 65 mg | -69.0% |
| Protein | 5.4 g | 3.8 g | -29.6% |
| Sodyum | 195 mg | 110 mg | -43.6% |
| Su | 46.2 g | 26 g | -43.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.22 g | 1.8 g | +718.2% |
| Toplam Folat | 32 µg | 28 µg | -12.5% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 4.5 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.9 g | 12.5 g | +1288.9% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 5.5 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 6.8 g | 39.5 g | +480.9% |
| Çinko | 0.88 mg | 0.45 mg | -48.9% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Sirutteok and Zalabya.
Sirutteok has less energy per 100 g (218 kcal versus 354 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Sirutteok has 0.9 g and Zalabya has 12.5 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Sirutteok 13, Zalabya 4.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.