Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
140 kcal
Score
10 / 100
Shengjianbao has a higher nutrition quality score (22) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
230 vs 140(-39.1%)
Score Diff
22 vs 10(-54.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Shengjianbao
Higher energy
Shengjianbao
Score leader
Shengjianbao
Nutrient split
18 - 2 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Shengjianbao and Com nieu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Shengjianbao has 230.0 kcal and Com nieu has 140.0 kcal. The difference is 90.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 22 and 10. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Shengjianbao | Com nieu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.22 mg | 0.08 mg | -63.6% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.52 µg | — | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.11 mg | 0.02 mg | -81.8% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.15 mg | 0.09 mg | -40.0% |
| Bakir | — | 0.08 mg | — |
| Demir | 1.4 mg | 0.8 mg | -42.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.2 g | 0.6 g | -50.0% |
| Enerji | — | 586 kj | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 140 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 58 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 105 mg | 43 mg | -59.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 24 mg | 10 mg | -58.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 23.5 g | 30.5 g | +29.8% |
| Kolesterol | 28 mg | — | — |
| Kül | — | 0.7 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 18 mg | 14 mg | -22.2% |
| Mangan | — | 0.45 mg | — |
| Niasin | 2.4 mg | 1.5 mg | -37.5% |
| Potasyum | 165 mg | 38 mg | -77.0% |
| Protein | 8.8 g | 2.7 g | -69.3% |
| Selenyum | — | 8.2 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 440 mg | 4 mg | -99.1% |
| Su | 55.4 g | 65.5 g | +18.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 3.6 g | 0.16 g | -95.6% |
| Toplam Folat | 34 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 4.8 g | 0.19 g | -96.0% |
| Toplam yağ | 11.2 g | 0.6 g | -94.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 1.7 g | 0.18 g | -89.4% |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.8 g | 0.1 g | -94.4% |
| Çinko | 1.2 mg | 0.55 mg | -54.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Shengjianbao and Com nieu.
Com nieu has less energy per 100 g (140 kcal versus 230 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Shengjianbao has 440 mg and Com nieu has 4 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Shengjianbao 22, Com nieu 10.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.