Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
275.7 kcal
Score
12 / 100
Girda has a higher nutrition quality score (12) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
326 vs 275.7(-15.4%)
Score Diff
10 vs 12(+20.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Girda
Higher energy
Sheermal
Score leader
Girda
Nutrient split
10 - 11 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Sheermal and Girda are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Sheermal has 326.0 kcal and Girda has 275.7 kcal. The difference is 50.3 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 10 and 12. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
21 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Sheermal | Girda | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 58 µg | — | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.21 mg | 0.28 mg | +33.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.14 mg | 0.18 mg | +28.6% |
| Demir | 2.1 mg | 2.4 mg | +14.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.1 g | 2.8 g | +33.3% |
| Folat DFE | 52 µg | 65 µg | +25.0% |
| Fosfor | 125 mg | 95 mg | -24.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 88 mg | 28 mg | -68.2% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 49.8 g | 55.4 g | +11.2% |
| Kolesterol | 21 mg | — | — |
| Kül | 1.7 g | 1.6 g | -5.9% |
| Magnezyum | 24 mg | 26 mg | +8.3% |
| Niasin | 1.85 mg | 2.6 mg | +40.5% |
| Potasyum | 152 mg | 135 mg | -11.2% |
| Protein | 8.2 g | 8.8 g | +7.3% |
| Sodyum | 335 mg | 480 mg | +43.3% |
| Su | 30.5 g | 32.1 g | +5.2% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 5.4 g | 0.45 g | -91.7% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 2.8 g | 0.55 g | -80.4% |
| Toplam yağ | 9.8 g | 2.1 g | -78.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.9 g | 0.85 g | -5.6% |
| Toplam Şeker | 7.6 g | 1.8 g | -76.3% |
| Çinko | 0.95 mg | 0.9 mg | -5.3% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Sheermal and Girda.
Girda has less energy per 100 g (275.7 kcal versus 326 kcal).
For measured Toplam doymus yağ asitleri, Sheermal has 5.4 g and Girda has 0.45 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Sheermal 10, Girda 12.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Sheermal · Girda · Methodology
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.