Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
407.3 kcal
Score
9 / 100
Shebakia and Maamoul have the same nutrition score (9).
Energy Diff
462.9 vs 407.3(-12.0%)
Score Diff
9 vs 9(0.0%)
Higher energy
Shebakia
Score leader
Score is equal
Nutrient split
14 - 4 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Shebakia and Maamoul are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Shebakia has 462.9 kcal and Maamoul has 407.3 kcal. The difference is 55.6 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 9 and 9. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Shebakia | Maamoul | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 52 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.18 mg | 0.14 mg | -22.2% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.12 mg | 0.09 mg | -25.0% |
| Demir | 2.4 mg | 1.85 mg | -22.9% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.8 g | 3.6 g | +28.6% |
| Folat DFE | — | 28 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 125 mg | 95 mg | -24.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 110 mg | 48 mg | -56.4% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 62.4 g | 58.5 g | -6.2% |
| Kolesterol | — | 32 mg | — |
| Kül | 1.8 g | 1.4 g | -22.2% |
| Magnezyum | 45 mg | 38 mg | -15.6% |
| Niasin | 1.5 mg | 1.2 mg | -20.0% |
| Potasyum | 180 mg | 275 mg | +52.8% |
| Protein | 7.2 g | 6.2 g | -13.9% |
| Sodyum | 140 mg | 115 mg | -17.9% |
| Su | 5.1 g | 13.8 g | +170.6% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 4.2 g | 8.8 g | +109.5% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 8.1 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 20.5 g | 16.5 g | -19.5% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 7.2 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 32.5 g | 26.2 g | -19.4% |
| Çinko | 1.1 mg | 0.85 mg | -22.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Shebakia and Maamoul.
Maamoul has less energy per 100 g (407.3 kcal versus 462.9 kcal).
For measured Su, Shebakia has 5.1 g and Maamoul has 13.8 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Shebakia 9, Maamoul 9.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.