Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
410 kcal
Score
12 / 100
Dasik has a higher nutrition quality score (12) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
462.9 vs 410(-11.4%)
Score Diff
9 vs 12(+33.3%)
OVERALL WINNER
Dasik
Higher energy
Shebakia
Score leader
Dasik
Nutrient split
10 - 10 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Shebakia and Dasik are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Shebakia has 462.9 kcal and Dasik has 410.0 kcal. The difference is 52.9 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 9 and 12. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Shebakia | Dasik | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.18 mg | 0.15 mg | -16.7% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.12 mg | 0.08 mg | -33.3% |
| Demir | 2.4 mg | 2.8 mg | +16.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.8 g | 3.2 g | +14.3% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 1.5 mg | — |
| Fosfor | 125 mg | 140 mg | +12.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 110 mg | 120 mg | +9.1% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 62.4 g | 70 g | +12.2% |
| Kül | 1.8 g | 1.3 g | -27.8% |
| Magnezyum | 45 mg | 65 mg | +44.4% |
| Niasin | 1.5 mg | 1.1 mg | -26.7% |
| Potasyum | 180 mg | 210 mg | +16.7% |
| Protein | 7.2 g | 6.5 g | -9.7% |
| Sodyum | 140 mg | 15 mg | -89.3% |
| Su | 5.1 g | 10.5 g | +105.9% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 4.2 g | 1.8 g | -57.1% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 8.1 g | 4.5 g | -44.4% |
| Toplam yağ | 20.5 g | 12 g | -41.5% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 7.2 g | 5.2 g | -27.8% |
| Toplam Şeker | 32.5 g | 35 g | +7.7% |
| Çinko | 1.1 mg | 1.2 mg | +9.1% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Shebakia and Dasik.
Dasik has less energy per 100 g (410 kcal versus 462.9 kcal).
For measured Su, Shebakia has 5.1 g and Dasik has 10.5 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Shebakia 9, Dasik 12.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Shebakia · Dasik · Methodology
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.