Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Şekerleme, Whatchamacallit Şeker Bar has a higher nutrition quality score (8) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
494 vs 304(-38.5%)
Score Diff
8 vs 2(-75.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Şekerleme, Whatchamacallit Şeker Bar
Higher energy
Şekerleme, Whatchamacallit Şeker Bar
Score leader
Şekerleme, Whatchamacallit Şeker Bar
Nutrient split
49 - 4 (tie: 17)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Şekerleme, Whatchamacallit Şeker Bar and Bal are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Şekerleme, Whatchamacallit Şeker Bar has 494.0 kcal and Bal has 304.0 kcal. The difference is 190.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 8 and 2. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
70 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Şekerleme, Whatchamacallit Şeker Bar | Bal | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | 126 iu | 0 iu | -100.0% |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 37 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Alanin | — | 0.01 g | — |
| Alfa Karoten | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Arjinin | — | 0.01 g | — |
| Aspartik asit | — | 0.03 g | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.11 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| B12 Vitamini | 0.37 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.21 mg | 0.04 mg | -81.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.04 mg | 0.02 mg | -50.0% |
| Bakir | 0.12 mg | 0.04 mg | -66.7% |
| Besin folati | 18 µg | 2 µg | -88.9% |
| Beta Karoten | 1 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Beta kriptoksantin | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Betain | — | 1.7 mg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 0.9 mg | 0.5 mg | -44.4% |
| D Vitamini | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| D Vitamini (IU) | 0 iu | 0 iu | — |
| Demir | 1.13 mg | 0.42 mg | -62.8% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 1.9 g | 0.2 g | -89.5% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 1.27 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | 0 mg | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | 494 kj | 304 kj | -38.5% |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Fenilalanin | — | 0.01 g | — |
| Florür | — | 7 µg | — |
| Folat DFE | 18 µg | 2 µg | -88.9% |
| Folik asit | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 138 mg | 4 mg | -97.1% |
| Fruktoz | — | 40.94 g | — |
| Galaktoz | — | 3.1 g | — |
| Glikoz | — | 35.75 g | — |
| Glisin | — | 0.01 g | — |
| Glutamik asit | — | 0.02 g | — |
| Histidin | — | 0 g | — |
| Izolosin | — | 0.01 g | — |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 4.3 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Kafein | 10 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Kalsiyum | 118 mg | 6 mg | -94.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 63.23 g | 82.4 g | +30.3% |
| Kolesterol | 12 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Kül | 1.66 g | 0.2 g | -88.0% |
| Likopen | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Lizin | — | 0.01 g | — |
| Losin | — | 0.01 g | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | 0 µg | 0 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 28 mg | 2 mg | -92.9% |
| Maltoz | — | 1.44 g | — |
| Mangan | 0.33 mg | 0.08 mg | -75.8% |
| Metiyonin | — | 0 g | — |
| MUFA 14:1 | 0.02 g | — | — |
| MUFA 15:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.04 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| MUFA 17:1 | 0 g | — | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 2.15 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| MUFA 22:1 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| MUFA 24:1 c | 0 g | — | — |
| Niasin | 2.47 mg | 0.12 mg | -95.1% |
| Pantotenik asit | 0.26 mg | 0.07 mg | -73.1% |
| Potasyum | 303 mg | 52 mg | -82.8% |
| Prolin | — | 0.09 g | — |
| Protein | 8.04 g | 0.3 g | -96.3% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 0.76 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.03 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:2 n-6 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:3 | 0 g | — | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | 0 g | 0 g | — |
| Retinol | 37 µg | 0 µg | -100.0% |
| Sakkaroz | — | 0.89 g | — |
| Selenyum | 0.7 µg | 0.8 µg | +14.3% |
| Serin | — | 0.01 g | — |
| SFA 10:0 | 0.45 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 12:0 | 3.66 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 13:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 1.8 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 15:0 | 0.05 g | — | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 5.26 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 17:0 | 0.05 g | — | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 4.71 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 20:0 | 0.12 g | — | — |
| SFA 22:0 | 0.01 g | — | — |
| SFA 24:0 | 0 g | — | — |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 0.4 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 6:0 | 0.17 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| SFA 8:0 | 0.33 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Sistin | — | 0 g | — |
| Sodyum | 299 mg | 4 mg | -98.7% |
| Su | 3.04 g | 17.1 g | +462.5% |
| Teobromin | 100 mg | 0 mg | -100.0% |
| Tirozin | — | 0.01 g | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 17.04 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Toplam Folat | 18 µg | 2 µg | -88.9% |
| Toplam Kolin | 25 mg | 2.2 mg | -91.2% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.78 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Toplam trans yağ asitleri | 0.12 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 23.68 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.83 g | 0 g | -100.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | 48.86 g | 82.12 g | +68.1% |
| Treonin | — | 0 g | — |
| Triptofan | — | 0 g | — |
| Valin | — | 0.01 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.43 mg | 0.22 mg | -48.8% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Şekerleme, Whatchamacallit Şeker Bar and Bal.
Bal has less energy per 100 g (304 kcal versus 494 kcal).
For measured Su, Şekerleme, Whatchamacallit Şeker Bar has 3.04 g and Bal has 17.1 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Şekerleme, Whatchamacallit Şeker Bar 8, Bal 2.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.