Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
164.5 kcal
Score
13 / 100
Kluai buat chi has a higher nutrition quality score (13) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
282 vs 164.5(-41.7%)
Score Diff
7 vs 13(+85.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Kluai buat chi
Higher energy
Sanwin makin
Score leader
Kluai buat chi
Nutrient split
11 - 5 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Sanwin makin and Kluai buat chi are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Sanwin makin has 282.0 kcal and Kluai buat chi has 164.5 kcal. The difference is 117.5 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 7 and 13. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
17 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Sanwin makin | Kluai buat chi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.09 mg | 0.032 mg | -64.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.07 mg | 0.038 mg | -45.7% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.18 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.12 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 4.8 mg | — |
| Demir | 1.1 mg | 0.45 mg | -59.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 1.6 g | 1.74 g | +8.7% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 164.5 kcal | — |
| Fosfor | 78 mg | 28 mg | -64.1% |
| Kalsiyum | 32 mg | 14.5 mg | -54.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 37.5 g | 20.85 g | -44.4% |
| Kül | 0.9 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 24 mg | 24 mg | 0.0% |
| Mangan | 0.22 mg | 0.38 mg | +72.7% |
| Niasin | 0.65 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 135 mg | 248 mg | +83.7% |
| Protein | 4.2 g | 1.15 g | -72.6% |
| Selenyum | 8.5 µg | — | — |
| Sodyum | 105 mg | 45 mg | -57.1% |
| Su | 44.5 g | 67.2 g | +51.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 7.9 g | 8.32 g | +5.3% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.2 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 12.8 g | 9.42 g | -26.4% |
| Toplam Şeker | 21.5 g | 14.2 g | -34.0% |
| Çinko | 0.55 mg | 0.22 mg | -60.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Sanwin makin and Kluai buat chi.
Kluai buat chi has less energy per 100 g (164.5 kcal versus 282 kcal).
For measured Potasyum, Sanwin makin has 135 mg and Kluai buat chi has 248 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Sanwin makin 7, Kluai buat chi 13.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.