Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
263 kcal
Score
6 / 100
Şampanya Sirkesi has a higher nutrition quality score (21) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
19 vs 263(+1284.2%)
Score Diff
21 vs 6(-71.4%)
OVERALL WINNER
Şampanya Sirkesi
Higher energy
Ahududu reçeli
Score leader
Şampanya Sirkesi
Nutrient split
1 - 15 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Şampanya Sirkesi and Ahududu reçeli are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Şampanya Sirkesi has 19.0 kcal and Ahududu reçeli has 263.0 kcal. The difference is 244.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 21 and 6. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
16 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Şampanya Sirkesi | Ahududu reçeli | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 2 µg | — |
| Bakir | 0.015 mg | 0.04 mg | +166.7% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 8 mg | — |
| Demir | 0.25 mg | 0.4 mg | +60.0% |
| Diyet lifi | 0 g | 1.1 g | — |
| Enerji | 79.5 kj | — | — |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 263 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 5 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 8 mg | 9 mg | +12.5% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 1.2 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 7 mg | 15 mg | +114.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0.9 g | 68 g | +7455.6% |
| Kül | 0.2 g | 0.3 g | +50.0% |
| Magnezyum | 4 mg | 6 mg | +50.0% |
| Mangan | 0.045 mg | 0.15 mg | +233.3% |
| Potasyum | 39 mg | 77 mg | +97.4% |
| Protein | 0.04 g | 0.4 g | +900.0% |
| Sodyum | 4 mg | 12 mg | +200.0% |
| Su | 94.8 g | 30.2 g | -68.1% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0 g | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0 g | 0.1 g | — |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.4 g | 60.3 g | +14975.0% |
| Çinko | 0.05 mg | 0.08 mg | +60.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Şampanya Sirkesi and Ahududu reçeli.
Şampanya Sirkesi has less energy per 100 g (19 kcal versus 263 kcal).
For measured Toplam Şeker, Şampanya Sirkesi has 0.4 g and Ahududu reçeli has 60.3 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Şampanya Sirkesi 21, Ahududu reçeli 6.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.