Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
292 kcal
Score
32 / 100
At least one nutrition score lacks comparable measurements, so no overall winner is assigned.
Energy Diff
876 vs 292(-66.7%)
Score Diff
— vs 32
Higher energy
Sade Yağ (Ghee)
Score leader
Insufficient data
Nutrient split
6 - 7 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Sade Yağ (Ghee) and Antep peyniri are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Sade Yağ (Ghee) has 876.0 kcal and Antep peyniri has 292.0 kcal. The difference is 584.0 kcal.
There are not enough comparable micronutrient measurements for a score comparison.
13 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Sade Yağ (Ghee) | Antep peyniri | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (IU) | 3069 iu | — | — |
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 840 µg | 195 µg | -76.8% |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 1.45 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.36 mg | — |
| Demir | — | 0.42 mg | — |
| Diyet lifi | — | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 2.8 mg | — | — |
| Enerji | — | 1221 kj | — |
| Fosfor | 3 mg | 450 mg | +14900.0% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | 8.6 µg | — | — |
| Kalsiyum | 4 mg | 680 mg | +16900.0% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 0 g | 1.8 g | — |
| Kolesterol | 256 mg | 72 mg | -71.9% |
| Kül | — | 6.7 g | — |
| Laktoz | — | 1.2 g | — |
| Magnezyum | — | 25 mg | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | 25 g | — | — |
| Potasyum | 5 mg | 115 mg | +2200.0% |
| Protein | 0.28 g | 21.5 g | +7578.6% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | 1.6 g | — | — |
| Retinol | — | 190 µg | — |
| SFA 14:0 | 10.2 g | — | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | 28.5 g | — | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | 12.1 g | — | — |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | 3.2 g | — | — |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | 1250 mg | +62400.0% |
| Su | 0.24 g | 48 g | +19900.0% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 61.9 g | 13.8 g | -77.7% |
| Toplam Kolin | 22.3 mg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 28.7 g | 5.8 g | -79.8% |
| Toplam yağ | 99.5 g | 22 g | -77.9% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 3.7 g | 0.85 g | -77.0% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 1.2 g | — |
| Çinko | — | 3.2 mg | — |
Scientific answers to key differences between Sade Yağ (Ghee) and Antep peyniri.
Antep peyniri has less energy per 100 g (292 kcal versus 876 kcal).
For measured Sodyum, Sade Yağ (Ghee) has 2 mg and Antep peyniri has 1250 mg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Sade Yağ (Ghee) —, Antep peyniri 32.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.