Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
272 kcal
Score
10 / 100
Manju has a higher nutrition quality score (10) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
218 vs 272(+24.8%)
Score Diff
8 vs 10(+25.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Manju
Higher energy
Manju
Score leader
Manju
Nutrient split
6 - 13 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Putu piring and Manju are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Putu piring has 218.0 kcal and Manju has 272.0 kcal. The difference is 54.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 8 and 10. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Putu piring | Manju | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.05 mg | 0.08 mg | +60.0% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.03 mg | 0.04 mg | +33.3% |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.06 mg | — |
| Bakir | — | 0.16 mg | — |
| Demir | 0.95 mg | 1.4 mg | +47.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.1 g | 3.6 g | +71.4% |
| Fosfor | 48 mg | 82 mg | +70.8% |
| Kalsiyum | 22 mg | 28 mg | +27.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 43.7 g | 60.5 g | +38.4% |
| Kül | 1.1 g | 0.8 g | -27.3% |
| Magnezyum | 18 mg | 26 mg | +44.4% |
| Mangan | 0.38 mg | 0.35 mg | -7.9% |
| Niasin | 0.85 mg | 0.85 mg | 0.0% |
| Potasyum | 132 mg | 185 mg | +40.2% |
| Protein | 2.8 g | 5.8 g | +107.1% |
| Sodyum | 95 mg | 65 mg | -31.6% |
| Su | 47.8 g | 29.1 g | -39.1% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 3.9 g | 0.18 g | -95.4% |
| Toplam Folat | 11 µg | 22 µg | +100.0% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.3 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 4.6 g | 0.8 g | -82.6% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.1 g | — | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 19.4 g | 37.2 g | +91.8% |
| Çinko | 0.52 mg | 0.75 mg | +44.2% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Putu piring and Manju.
Putu piring has less energy per 100 g (218 kcal versus 272 kcal).
For measured Protein, Putu piring has 2.8 g and Manju has 5.8 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Putu piring 8, Manju 10.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.