Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
368 kcal
Score
32 / 100
Kinoa (Pişmiş) and Kinoa (Pişmemiş) have the same nutrition score (32).
Energy Diff
120 vs 368(+206.7%)
Score Diff
32 vs 32(0.0%)
Higher energy
Kinoa (Pişmemiş)
Score leader
Score is equal
Nutrient split
2 - 16 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Kinoa (Pişmiş) and Kinoa (Pişmemiş) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Kinoa (Pişmiş) has 120.0 kcal and Kinoa (Pişmemiş) has 368.0 kcal. The difference is 248.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 32 and 32. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Kinoa (Pişmiş) | Kinoa (Pişmemiş) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.107 mg | 0.36 mg | +236.4% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.11 mg | 0.32 mg | +190.9% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.123 mg | 0.49 mg | +298.4% |
| Bakir | 0.192 mg | 0.59 mg | +207.3% |
| Demir | 1.49 mg | 4.57 mg | +206.7% |
| Diyet lifi | 2.8 g | 7 g | +150.0% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | 120 kcal | — | — |
| Folat DFE | 42 µg | 184 µg | +338.1% |
| Fosfor | 152 mg | 457 mg | +200.7% |
| Kalsiyum | 17 mg | 47 mg | +176.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 21.3 g | 64.16 g | +201.2% |
| Kül | — | 2.38 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 64 mg | 197 mg | +207.8% |
| Mangan | 0.631 mg | 2.03 mg | +221.7% |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | — | 1.61 g | — |
| Niasin | 0.412 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 172 mg | 563 mg | +227.3% |
| Protein | 4.4 g | 14.12 g | +220.9% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | — | 3.29 g | — |
| Selenyum | 2.8 µg | — | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | — | 0.71 g | — |
| Sodyum | 7 mg | 5 mg | -28.6% |
| Su | 71.61 g | 13.28 g | -81.5% |
| Toplam yağ | 1.92 g | 6.07 g | +216.1% |
| Çinko | 1.09 mg | 3.1 mg | +184.4% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Kinoa (Pişmiş) and Kinoa (Pişmemiş).
Kinoa (Pişmiş) has less energy per 100 g (120 kcal versus 368 kcal).
For measured Folat DFE, Kinoa (Pişmiş) has 42 µg and Kinoa (Pişmemiş) has 184 µg per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Kinoa (Pişmiş) 32, Kinoa (Pişmemiş) 32.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.