Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
368 kcal
Score
32 / 100
Pirinç kepeği has a higher nutrition quality score (71) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
316 vs 368(+16.5%)
Score Diff
71 vs 32(-54.9%)
OVERALL WINNER
Pirinç kepeği
Higher energy
Altın kinoa
Score leader
Pirinç kepeği
Nutrient split
13 - 5 (tie: 1)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Pirinç kepeği and Altın kinoa are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Pirinç kepeği has 316.0 kcal and Altın kinoa has 368.0 kcal. The difference is 52.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 71 and 32. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
19 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Pirinç kepeği | Altın kinoa | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 2.75 mg | 0.36 mg | -86.9% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.284 mg | 0.32 mg | +12.7% |
| B6 Vitamini | 4.07 mg | 0.49 mg | -88.0% |
| Bakir | 0.498 mg | 0.59 mg | +18.5% |
| Demir | 18.54 mg | 4.57 mg | -75.4% |
| Diyet lifi | 21 g | 7 g | -66.7% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 4.93 mg | 2.44 mg | -50.5% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 368 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | 63 µg | — | — |
| Fosfor | 1677 mg | 457 mg | -72.7% |
| Kalsiyum | 57 mg | 47 mg | -17.5% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 49.69 g | 64.16 g | +29.1% |
| Kül | 9.9 g | — | — |
| Magnezyum | 781 mg | 197 mg | -74.8% |
| Mangan | 13.1 mg | 2 mg | -84.7% |
| Niasin | 34 mg | 1.52 mg | -95.5% |
| Pantotenik asit | 7.39 mg | — | — |
| Potasyum | 1485 mg | 563 mg | -62.1% |
| Protein | 13.35 g | 14.12 g | +5.8% |
| Selenyum | — | 8.5 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 5 mg | 5 mg | 0.0% |
| Su | 6.21 g | 13.28 g | +113.8% |
| Toplam Folat | — | 184 µg | — |
| Toplam yağ | 20.85 g | 6.07 g | -70.9% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 0.1 g | — |
| Çinko | 6.04 mg | 3.1 mg | -48.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Pirinç kepeği and Altın kinoa.
Pirinç kepeği has less energy per 100 g (316 kcal versus 368 kcal).
For measured Su, Pirinç kepeği has 6.21 g and Altın kinoa has 13.28 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Pirinç kepeği 71, Altın kinoa 32.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.