Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
371 kcal
Score
41 / 100
Amarant Tohumu has a higher nutrition quality score (41) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
342 vs 371(+8.5%)
Score Diff
24 vs 41(+70.8%)
OVERALL WINNER
Amarant Tohumu
Higher energy
Amarant Tohumu
Score leader
Amarant Tohumu
Nutrient split
5 - 19 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Pilavlık Bulgur and Amarant Tohumu are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Pilavlık Bulgur has 342.0 kcal and Amarant Tohumu has 371.0 kcal. The difference is 29.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 24 and 41. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
24 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Pilavlık Bulgur | Amarant Tohumu | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.232 mg | 0.12 mg | -48.3% |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.115 mg | 0.2 mg | +73.9% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.342 mg | 0.59 mg | +72.5% |
| Bakir | 0.335 mg | 0.53 mg | +58.2% |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 4.2 mg | — |
| Demir | 2.46 mg | 7.61 mg | +209.3% |
| Diyet lifi | 18.3 g | 6.7 g | -63.4% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 1.19 mg | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 82 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 300 mg | 557 mg | +85.7% |
| Kalsiyum | 35 mg | 159 mg | +354.3% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 75.87 g | 65.25 g | -14.0% |
| Kül | 1.51 g | 2.88 g | +90.7% |
| Lizin | — | 0.75 g | — |
| Magnezyum | 164 mg | 248 mg | +51.2% |
| Mangan | 3.048 mg | 3.33 mg | +9.3% |
| Niasin | 5.114 mg | 0.92 mg | -82.0% |
| Pantotenik asit | — | 1.46 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 410 mg | 508 mg | +23.9% |
| Protein | 12.29 g | 13.56 g | +10.3% |
| Selenyum | 2.3 µg | 18.7 µg | +713.0% |
| Sodyum | 17 mg | 4 mg | -76.5% |
| Su | 9 g | 11.29 g | +25.4% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.232 g | 1.46 g | +529.3% |
| Toplam Folat | 27 µg | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.179 g | 1.69 g | +844.1% |
| Toplam yağ | 1.33 g | 7.02 g | +427.8% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.548 g | 2.78 g | +407.3% |
| Toplam Şeker | 0.41 g | 1.69 g | +312.2% |
| Çinko | 1.93 mg | 2.87 mg | +48.7% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Pilavlık Bulgur and Amarant Tohumu.
Pilavlık Bulgur has less energy per 100 g (342 kcal versus 371 kcal).
For measured Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri, Pilavlık Bulgur has 0.179 g and Amarant Tohumu has 1.69 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Pilavlık Bulgur 24, Amarant Tohumu 41.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.