Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Parmak Limon (Finger Lime) has a higher nutrition quality score (63) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
30 vs 71(+136.7%)
Score Diff
63 vs 43(-31.7%)
OVERALL WINNER
Parmak Limon (Finger Lime)
Higher energy
Kamkat, Çiğ
Score leader
Parmak Limon (Finger Lime)
Nutrient split
1 - 17 (tie: 2)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Parmak Limon (Finger Lime) and Kamkat, Çiğ are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Parmak Limon (Finger Lime) has 30.0 kcal and Kamkat, Çiğ has 71.0 kcal. The difference is 41.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 63 and 43. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
20 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Parmak Limon (Finger Lime) | Kamkat, Çiğ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | 2 µg | 15 µg | +650.0% |
| Alfa Karoten | — | 155 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | 0.03 mg | 0.04 mg | +33.3% |
| B12 Vitamini | — | 0 µg | — |
| B12 Vitamini (eklenmiş) | — | 0 µg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | 0.02 mg | 0.09 mg | +350.0% |
| B6 Vitamini | 0.04 mg | 0.04 mg | 0.0% |
| Bakir | — | 0.1 mg | — |
| Besin folati | — | 17 µg | — |
| Beta Karoten | — | 0 µg | — |
| Beta kriptoksantin | — | 193 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | 29.1 mg | 43.9 mg | +50.9% |
| D Vitamini | — | 0 µg | — |
| Demir | 0.6 mg | 0.86 mg | +43.3% |
| DHA (22:6 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| Diyet lifi | 2.8 g | 6.5 g | +132.1% |
| DPA (22:5 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | — | 0.15 mg | — |
| E Vitamini (eklenmiş) | — | 0 mg | — |
| Enerji | — | 71 kj | — |
| EPA (20:5 n-3) | — | 0 g | — |
| Etil alkol | — | 0 g | — |
| Folat DFE | 8 µg | 17 µg | +112.5% |
| Folik asit | — | 0 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 18 mg | 19 mg | +5.6% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 0 µg | — |
| Kafein | — | 0 mg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 33 mg | 62 mg | +87.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 7.2 g | 15.9 g | +120.8% |
| Kolesterol | — | 0 mg | — |
| Likopen | — | 0 µg | — |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | — | 129 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 20 mg | 20 mg | 0.0% |
| MUFA 16:1 | — | 0.02 g | — |
| MUFA 18:1 (oleik asit) | — | 0.14 g | — |
| MUFA 20:1 | — | 0 g | — |
| MUFA 22:1 | — | 0 g | — |
| Niasin | 0.2 mg | 0.43 mg | +115.0% |
| Potasyum | 150 mg | 186 mg | +24.0% |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 1.88 g | +70.9% |
| PUFA 18:2 (linoleik asit) | — | 0.12 g | — |
| PUFA 18:3 | — | 0.05 g | — |
| PUFA 18:4 | — | 0 g | — |
| PUFA 20:4 (arasidonik asit) | — | 0 g | — |
| Retinol | — | 0 µg | — |
| Selenyum | — | 0 µg | — |
| SFA 10:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 12:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 14:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 16:0 (palmitik asit) | — | 0.09 g | — |
| SFA 18:0 (stearik asit) | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 4:0 (butirik asit) | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 6:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| SFA 8:0 | — | 0 g | — |
| Sodyum | 2 mg | 10 mg | +400.0% |
| Su | 88.1 g | 80.85 g | -8.2% |
| Teobromin | — | 0 mg | — |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | — | 0.1 g | — |
| Toplam Folat | — | 17 µg | — |
| Toplam Kolin | — | 8.4 mg | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.15 g | — |
| Toplam yağ | 0.1 g | 0.86 g | +760.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | — | 0.17 g | — |
| Toplam Şeker | 1.7 g | 9.36 g | +450.6% |
| Çinko | 0.1 mg | 0.17 mg | +70.0% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Parmak Limon (Finger Lime) and Kamkat, Çiğ.
Parmak Limon (Finger Lime) has less energy per 100 g (30 kcal versus 71 kcal).
For measured Toplam yağ, Parmak Limon (Finger Lime) has 0.1 g and Kamkat, Çiğ has 0.86 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Parmak Limon (Finger Lime) 63, Kamkat, Çiğ 43.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.