Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
315 kcal
Score
76 / 100
Adaçayı (Kuru) has a higher nutrition quality score (76) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
340 vs 315(-7.3%)
Score Diff
8 vs 76(+850.0%)
OVERALL WINNER
Adaçayı (Kuru)
Higher energy
Mastika
Score leader
Adaçayı (Kuru)
Nutrient split
3 - 15 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Mastika and Adaçayı (Kuru) are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Mastika has 340.0 kcal and Adaçayı (Kuru) has 315.0 kcal. The difference is 25.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 8 and 76. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
18 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Mastika | Adaçayı (Kuru) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 295 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.75 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.34 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 2.69 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.12 mg | — | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 31.4 mg | — |
| Demir | 1.8 mg | 28.12 mg | +1462.2% |
| Diyet lifi | 78 g | 40.3 g | -48.3% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.6 mg | 7.48 mg | +1146.7% |
| Folat DFE | — | 274 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 18 mg | 91 mg | +405.6% |
| K Vitamini (filokinon) | — | 1714 µg | — |
| Kalsiyum | 95 mg | 1652 mg | +1638.9% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 82 g | 60.73 g | -25.9% |
| Kül | 0.5 g | 7.93 g | +1486.0% |
| Magnezyum | 25 mg | 428 mg | +1612.0% |
| Mangan | 0.25 mg | 3.13 mg | +1152.0% |
| Niasin | — | 5.72 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 110 mg | 1070 mg | +872.7% |
| Protein | 0.15 g | 10.63 g | +6986.7% |
| Sodyum | 12 mg | 11 mg | -8.3% |
| Su | 1.5 g | 7.96 g | +430.7% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.2 g | 7.01 g | +3405.0% |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.4 g | 1.87 g | +367.5% |
| Toplam yağ | 1.2 g | 12.75 g | +962.5% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.3 g | 1.76 g | +486.7% |
| Toplam Şeker | — | 1.71 g | — |
| Çinko | 0.8 mg | 4.7 mg | +487.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Mastika and Adaçayı (Kuru).
Adaçayı (Kuru) has less energy per 100 g (315 kcal versus 340 kcal).
For measured Protein, Mastika has 0.15 g and Adaçayı (Kuru) has 10.63 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Mastika 8, Adaçayı (Kuru) 76.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.