Compare two different foods side-by-side by nutrients, energy, and quality scores.
The CSV contains energy and nutrients per 100 g for these two records only. Missing measurements remain blank rather than zero. Model scores and personal health conclusions are not exported.
Share your experiences or ask your questions.
Energy
373 kcal
Score
43 / 100
Achiote has a higher nutrition quality score (43) and is the overall winner.
Energy Diff
340 vs 373(+9.7%)
Score Diff
8 vs 43(+437.5%)
OVERALL WINNER
Achiote
Higher energy
Achiote
Score leader
Achiote
Nutrient split
2 - 13 (tie: 0)
This chart shows energy per 100 g for both foods.
Each axis is normalized to 0-100; the outer shape indicates relative dominance on that nutrient.
Green/blue bars indicate first food advantage, orange bars indicate second food advantage.
Mastika and Achiote are compared on a 100 g basis. Check each food record for preparation and portion differences.
Per 100 g, Mastika has 340.0 kcal and Achiote has 373.0 kcal. The difference is 33.0 kcal.
The recorded nutrition model scores are 8 and 43. These scores are not personal health outcomes or clinical advice.
15 nutrients have measurements for both records. A dash in the table means no measurement is available; it does not mean zero.
| Nutrients | Mastika | Achiote | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Vitamini (RAE) | — | 100 µg | — |
| B1 Vitamini (Tiamin) | — | 0.25 mg | — |
| B2 Vitamini (Riboflavin) | — | 0.4 mg | — |
| B6 Vitamini | — | 0.35 mg | — |
| Bakir | 0.12 mg | 0.5 mg | +316.7% |
| Beta Karoten | — | 1200 µg | — |
| C Vitamini (askorbik asit) | — | 2 mg | — |
| Demir | 1.8 mg | 6.5 mg | +261.1% |
| Diyet lifi | 78 g | 16.5 g | -78.8% |
| E Vitamini (alfa-tokoferol) | 0.6 mg | 0.5 mg | -16.7% |
| Enerji (Atwater Genel Faktörleri) | — | 373 kcal | — |
| Folat DFE | — | 120 µg | — |
| Fosfor | 18 mg | 250 mg | +1288.9% |
| Kalsiyum | 95 mg | 355 mg | +273.7% |
| Karbonhidrat (farkla) | 82 g | — | — |
| Karbonhidrat (toplamla) | — | 60.3 g | — |
| Kül | 0.5 g | 6.48 g | +1196.0% |
| Lutein + zeaksantin | — | 50 µg | — |
| Magnezyum | 25 mg | 280 mg | +1020.0% |
| Mangan | 0.25 mg | 1.5 mg | +500.0% |
| Niasin | — | 3 mg | — |
| Potasyum | 110 mg | 1250 mg | +1036.4% |
| Protein | 0.15 g | 12.86 g | +8473.3% |
| Selenyum | — | 5 µg | — |
| Sodyum | 12 mg | 20 mg | +66.7% |
| Su | 1.5 g | 8 g | +433.3% |
| Toplam doymus yağ asitleri | 0.2 g | — | — |
| Toplam tekli doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.4 g | — | — |
| Toplam yağ | 1.2 g | 12.36 g | +930.0% |
| Toplam çoklu doymamis yağ asitleri | 0.3 g | — | — |
| Çinko | 0.8 mg | 2.5 mg | +212.5% |
Scientific answers to key differences between Mastika and Achiote.
Mastika has less energy per 100 g (340 kcal versus 373 kcal).
For measured Protein, Mastika has 0.15 g and Achiote has 12.86 g per 100 g. The table shows other nutrients separately.
The score summarizes this site's nutrient model. It does not establish that one food is healthier or suitable for everyone. Scores: Mastika 8, Achiote 43.
Energy and nutrient values in the table are per 100 g. Actual intake changes with serving size.
Data Sources
Records may come from different sources. Check each food page for source and preparation details; do not treat missing measurements as zero.
Analytical Methodology
The scoring algorithm is a scale of 100 based on nutrient density and macro/micro component balance.